The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
— Note to closing admin:
Aditya Kabir (
talk •
contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this
AfD.
Strong Keep Seems to me to be clearly notable. I wonder if nom followed criteria at
WP:BEFORE which states "If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources" and then "The minimum search expected is a Google Books search and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects", as reliable sources have been found. The fact an article is poorly or promotionally written does not justify deletion, it justifies improvement and re-writing. Also think this is a case of
WP:GEOBIAS, the systemic lack of coverage and lack of a desire for coverage for primarily non-English speaking countries.
AusLondonder (
talk) 03:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
— Note to closing admin:
Aditya Kabir (
talk •
contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this
AfD.
Strong Keep Seems to me to be clearly notable. I wonder if nom followed criteria at
WP:BEFORE which states "If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources" and then "The minimum search expected is a Google Books search and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects", as reliable sources have been found. The fact an article is poorly or promotionally written does not justify deletion, it justifies improvement and re-writing. Also think this is a case of
WP:GEOBIAS, the systemic lack of coverage and lack of a desire for coverage for primarily non-English speaking countries.
AusLondonder (
talk) 03:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.