The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Seems to fail
WP:GNG. PROD was reverted by
DGG some years ago but there was no explanation for doing so. It is certainly a last name but I have struggled for years to find reliable sources that discuss it as a Jat clan.
Sitush (
talk)
12:05, 13 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete--
This does insignificantly mention it to be a Jat clan but the main thrust is on it's usage as a last name.Sparse hits in Raj-era-references are located but must be discounted on concerns of reliability.Nothing else.
∯WBGconverse04:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)reply
When I decline a prod, I sometimes mean that I think the article should stay in WP , but more often, just that that it needs discussion or a ry at better sourcing. In this particular case, I declined it in 2013, when the article was
[1]. It had sources--I gather that those working in the area consider the sources unreliable and have removed them. I have disagreed with this, and I continue to disagree with this, but the consensus appears to have been otherwise. I think it any case it needs a search for sources by those qualified to do so. DGG (
talk )
05:35, 14 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Seems to fail
WP:GNG. PROD was reverted by
DGG some years ago but there was no explanation for doing so. It is certainly a last name but I have struggled for years to find reliable sources that discuss it as a Jat clan.
Sitush (
talk)
12:05, 13 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete--
This does insignificantly mention it to be a Jat clan but the main thrust is on it's usage as a last name.Sparse hits in Raj-era-references are located but must be discounted on concerns of reliability.Nothing else.
∯WBGconverse04:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)reply
When I decline a prod, I sometimes mean that I think the article should stay in WP , but more often, just that that it needs discussion or a ry at better sourcing. In this particular case, I declined it in 2013, when the article was
[1]. It had sources--I gather that those working in the area consider the sources unreliable and have removed them. I have disagreed with this, and I continue to disagree with this, but the consensus appears to have been otherwise. I think it any case it needs a search for sources by those qualified to do so. DGG (
talk )
05:35, 14 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.