The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment. I just pruned the majority of the article as unverifiable or non-neutral. Haven't checked into notability. —
siroχo 04:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Generally best not to do that while the article is at AfD, so that participants can get a better idea of the subject's notability (or lack of it).
Espresso Addict (
talk) 13:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)reply
That's why I noted it here, but to be clear I haven't removed anything that established notability. —
siroχo 22:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting. Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 02:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Miss Afghanistan as
WP:ATD. That article is currently a
WP:SETINDEX (a type of list), and as such only requires verifiability to include, I've added a reference for such. (I checked notability and was unable to find sources to establish it). —
siroχo 07:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting, I don't think a Redirect to
Miss Afghanistan is a good closure decision as it is just a disambiguation page that contains this article on it. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 03:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Liz, I'm not an expert on the topic, but the page at that title claims to be a
WP:set index which is not intended to be a type of disambiguation. This does not appear to have been an annual competition like some, so it may very well be a complete set index, but I'm not sure. —
siroχo 03:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete No indication of notability. Fails to meet criteria of
WP:GNG. Not enough sources to confirm intrinsic value of an article.
Delete - couldn't find much in the way of
WP:RS. The CNN source
[1] looked promising until I realized that it was part iReport initiative, which is user generated and not verified by the company. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
KH-1 (
talk •
contribs) 07:04, 27 September 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment. I just pruned the majority of the article as unverifiable or non-neutral. Haven't checked into notability. —
siroχo 04:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Generally best not to do that while the article is at AfD, so that participants can get a better idea of the subject's notability (or lack of it).
Espresso Addict (
talk) 13:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)reply
That's why I noted it here, but to be clear I haven't removed anything that established notability. —
siroχo 22:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting. Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 02:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Miss Afghanistan as
WP:ATD. That article is currently a
WP:SETINDEX (a type of list), and as such only requires verifiability to include, I've added a reference for such. (I checked notability and was unable to find sources to establish it). —
siroχo 07:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting, I don't think a Redirect to
Miss Afghanistan is a good closure decision as it is just a disambiguation page that contains this article on it. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 03:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Liz, I'm not an expert on the topic, but the page at that title claims to be a
WP:set index which is not intended to be a type of disambiguation. This does not appear to have been an annual competition like some, so it may very well be a complete set index, but I'm not sure. —
siroχo 03:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete No indication of notability. Fails to meet criteria of
WP:GNG. Not enough sources to confirm intrinsic value of an article.
Delete - couldn't find much in the way of
WP:RS. The CNN source
[1] looked promising until I realized that it was part iReport initiative, which is user generated and not verified by the company. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
KH-1 (
talk •
contribs) 07:04, 27 September 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.