The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Contested PROD (removed with no rationale). There is only minimal coverage of this upcoming film, which the one source provided indicates isn't meant to be released until the end of the year, making this clearly TOOSOON for an article. While the cast members listed are notable, notability isn't inherited.
BigHaz -
Schreit mich an23:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment. It may be worth mentioning that there's certainly no prejudice towards the recreation of this article if and when the production is further along and/or the coverage justifies it. As the facts on the ground change, an article subject can always become notable.
BigHaz -
Schreit mich an04:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)reply
An opinion you've expressed elsewhere, yes. This comment was written earlier in the piece, and responded to what appeared to be a concern at that time.
BigHaz -
Schreit mich an03:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)reply
If there's coverage, and that coverage satisfies either NFILM or GNG, then it doesn't matter what prompted the coverage. No disagreement there. My point is that notability is
WP:NOTINHERITED, and the article doesn't get a free pass simply because a phalanx of performers with notability are in it. The film needs to be notable itself, no?
BigHaz -
Schreit mich an23:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Contested PROD (removed with no rationale). There is only minimal coverage of this upcoming film, which the one source provided indicates isn't meant to be released until the end of the year, making this clearly TOOSOON for an article. While the cast members listed are notable, notability isn't inherited.
BigHaz -
Schreit mich an23:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment. It may be worth mentioning that there's certainly no prejudice towards the recreation of this article if and when the production is further along and/or the coverage justifies it. As the facts on the ground change, an article subject can always become notable.
BigHaz -
Schreit mich an04:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)reply
An opinion you've expressed elsewhere, yes. This comment was written earlier in the piece, and responded to what appeared to be a concern at that time.
BigHaz -
Schreit mich an03:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)reply
If there's coverage, and that coverage satisfies either NFILM or GNG, then it doesn't matter what prompted the coverage. No disagreement there. My point is that notability is
WP:NOTINHERITED, and the article doesn't get a free pass simply because a phalanx of performers with notability are in it. The film needs to be notable itself, no?
BigHaz -
Schreit mich an23:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.