- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snow close delete. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:36, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Ba-Con
- Ba-Con ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- Rikuskellington ( talk) 02:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Keep I believe that this is notable in the fact that it is a free convention, and it deserves a place on Wiki. As do many other smaller conventions that exist in the country. If we start allowing small conventions to have a place on Wikipedia, it will help the communities and conventions grow, and allow people more options when looking for conventions, especially local ones. - Rikuskellington ( talk) 02:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not for promotional purposes or to tell the world about your good causes. Events must be shown to be notable with many sources. 331dot ( talk) 11:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 January 26. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 11:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I currently see no strong evidence of notability. One press release published by a local paper doesn't really cut it. See WP:V. -- Dweller ( talk) 11:12, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete There are some problems here. The page was proposed for deletion but the above user has created an AFD discussion as a means to resolve that prod. I'm not sure what the procedure is under these circumstances. However this is an non notable convention. As this article was made by a single purpose account (no edits unrelated to this article) it's hard to imagine this being anything less than blatant promotion, either by the organisers or a person who is simply interested in the con. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it is not for promoting local events. SephyTheThird ( talk) 11:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. A local event covered in a local newspaper does not meet notability guidelines, as I state in the PROD. 331dot ( talk) 11:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete – All in favor of promoting local events, but WP is not supposed to be for promotion. There are better venues for that. We also need more in-depth sources. – Margin1522 ( talk) 12:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails notability guidelines, a local non notable small event. I also went ahead and declined the PROD that had been left on the page since the article is at AfD. Safiel ( talk) 16:27, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No notability in the form of reliable sources = No article here on Wikipedia. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 20:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 21:02, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 21:02, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. It should be noted that the "weak keep" vote above is from the creator of the page. 331dot ( talk) 01:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree and feel it would qualify as a WP:SNOW delete at this point. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 03:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, the article speaks for itself and the response is consistent. SephyTheThird ( talk) 16:18, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Promotional announcement of a minor local convention. Carrite ( talk) 19:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snow close delete. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:36, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Ba-Con
- Ba-Con ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- Rikuskellington ( talk) 02:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Keep I believe that this is notable in the fact that it is a free convention, and it deserves a place on Wiki. As do many other smaller conventions that exist in the country. If we start allowing small conventions to have a place on Wikipedia, it will help the communities and conventions grow, and allow people more options when looking for conventions, especially local ones. - Rikuskellington ( talk) 02:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not for promotional purposes or to tell the world about your good causes. Events must be shown to be notable with many sources. 331dot ( talk) 11:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 January 26. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 11:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I currently see no strong evidence of notability. One press release published by a local paper doesn't really cut it. See WP:V. -- Dweller ( talk) 11:12, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete There are some problems here. The page was proposed for deletion but the above user has created an AFD discussion as a means to resolve that prod. I'm not sure what the procedure is under these circumstances. However this is an non notable convention. As this article was made by a single purpose account (no edits unrelated to this article) it's hard to imagine this being anything less than blatant promotion, either by the organisers or a person who is simply interested in the con. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it is not for promoting local events. SephyTheThird ( talk) 11:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. A local event covered in a local newspaper does not meet notability guidelines, as I state in the PROD. 331dot ( talk) 11:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete – All in favor of promoting local events, but WP is not supposed to be for promotion. There are better venues for that. We also need more in-depth sources. – Margin1522 ( talk) 12:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails notability guidelines, a local non notable small event. I also went ahead and declined the PROD that had been left on the page since the article is at AfD. Safiel ( talk) 16:27, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No notability in the form of reliable sources = No article here on Wikipedia. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 20:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 21:02, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 21:02, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. It should be noted that the "weak keep" vote above is from the creator of the page. 331dot ( talk) 01:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree and feel it would qualify as a WP:SNOW delete at this point. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 03:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, the article speaks for itself and the response is consistent. SephyTheThird ( talk) 16:18, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Promotional announcement of a minor local convention. Carrite ( talk) 19:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.