The result was no consensus. Interpreting Uncle G's as a keep, or at least not to delete based on his analysis. I don't see an additional relist providing more input. This does not preclude a merger back if that's decided on editorially. Star Mississippi 02:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
BBC Four's main page already has a section called "Presentation" which summarises this page well. This page is entirely unnecessary, there are many other websites which will give the reader information about channel idents. This page is convoluted and does not belong on Wikipedia. ComplainingCamel ( talk) 17:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
That said, the existence of History of BBC television idents and the fact that no-one has actually gone to look for the outright books on this subject (which have lots on Two, but not Three and Four), and that all three of the places where we cover this are solely based upon WWW sites named "TV ARK" and suchlike, does mean that there's just been uncritical dumping into three separate places in Wikipedia. But it does not take the administrator deletion tool to fix this, just an editor with a bit of willingness to pull the finger out, read the books, and mercilessly merge with the ordinary editing tool.
There's another channel with a lot written about its idents that I kept turning up because I thought that "channel" might be a good restrictive search term. It turns out not to be.
Keep There is no reason for this to be deleted as it is well references and passes any notability issues.( Rillington ( talk) 15:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC))
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
AssumeGoodWraith (
talk |
contribs) 02:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Interpreting Uncle G's as a keep, or at least not to delete based on his analysis. I don't see an additional relist providing more input. This does not preclude a merger back if that's decided on editorially. Star Mississippi 02:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
BBC Four's main page already has a section called "Presentation" which summarises this page well. This page is entirely unnecessary, there are many other websites which will give the reader information about channel idents. This page is convoluted and does not belong on Wikipedia. ComplainingCamel ( talk) 17:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
That said, the existence of History of BBC television idents and the fact that no-one has actually gone to look for the outright books on this subject (which have lots on Two, but not Three and Four), and that all three of the places where we cover this are solely based upon WWW sites named "TV ARK" and suchlike, does mean that there's just been uncritical dumping into three separate places in Wikipedia. But it does not take the administrator deletion tool to fix this, just an editor with a bit of willingness to pull the finger out, read the books, and mercilessly merge with the ordinary editing tool.
There's another channel with a lot written about its idents that I kept turning up because I thought that "channel" might be a good restrictive search term. It turns out not to be.
Keep There is no reason for this to be deleted as it is well references and passes any notability issues.( Rillington ( talk) 15:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC))
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
AssumeGoodWraith (
talk |
contribs) 02:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)