- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus is that the subject meets Wikipedia's General notability guideline. North America 1000 06:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ayu Nakada ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Association football. -- Gonta-Kun ( talk) 05:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Delete (Proposer)-- Gonta-Kun ( talk) 05:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Struck duplicate !vote from nominator; the nomination is considered as your !vote. However, feel free to comment all you'd like. North America 1000 06:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 05:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 05:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 05:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 05:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note:AfD fixed. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 06:16, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 06:18, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Although this player fails WP:NFOOTY, but may pass WP:GNG. Pinging Hmlarson, thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 06:21, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:36, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Strong keep. She's actually a famous person in Japan and easily passes WP:GNG. Google News search in Japanese: [1]. -- Moscow Connection ( talk) 12:36, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Fails NFOOTY, but passes wider GNG. Significant, non-routine coverage can be found within the article already. The fact that this is based on her looks / appearance rather than her footballing achievements is not relevant. Fenix down ( talk) 08:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There is surprisingly quite a bit on her on the web and she does seem to pass GNG in my opinion. Govvy ( talk) 20:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - subject fails WP:NFOOTY but that is irrelevant as she passes WP:GNG anyway, even though most of the coverage is for a pretty trivial reason. Inter&anthro ( talk) 02:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete she fails NFOOTY, so the GNG is less relevant for sourcing about here career: we can assume it is routine. In terms of the GNG for things that are trivial: if it is trivial coverage simply about her looks, I wouldn't count that as meeting the GNG.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
15:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Did you even look at the sources? Articles like this are not "trivial coverage", that's practically a finished encyclopedic article about her. -- Moscow Connection ( talk) 03:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- That makes no sense Tony. Just because someone dosent pass NFOOTY doesnt mean they can't pass GNG. Passing NFOOTY presumes passing GNG, but it is not true to say that failing NFOOTY presumes failing GNG. Further comments from other editors about coverage being trivial concerns the fact that coverage focuses on her looks rather than her footballing skill not being trivial in terms of depth. Fenix down ( talk) 07:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 19:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 19:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Strong keep Although it's true she fails WP:NFOOTY for now, she clearly passes WP:GNG with multiple sourced providing in-depth coverage of her career (starting with this article that Moscow Connection already pointed out). NFOOTY is just used to suggest that players who pass the guideline might be notable, but someone passing GNG confirms notability. JTtheOG ( talk) 07:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - I tend to agree that she fails WP:NFOOTY but passes WP:GNG. -- Dane talk 03:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - While her rise to fame comes from her soccer career, but as shown by others in this discussion, she has had significant coverage in Japan in regards to her, enough to pass GNG. WikiVirus C (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus is that the subject meets Wikipedia's General notability guideline. North America 1000 06:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ayu Nakada ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Association football. -- Gonta-Kun ( talk) 05:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Delete (Proposer)-- Gonta-Kun ( talk) 05:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Struck duplicate !vote from nominator; the nomination is considered as your !vote. However, feel free to comment all you'd like. North America 1000 06:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 05:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 05:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 05:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 05:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note:AfD fixed. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 06:16, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 06:18, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Although this player fails WP:NFOOTY, but may pass WP:GNG. Pinging Hmlarson, thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 06:21, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:36, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Strong keep. She's actually a famous person in Japan and easily passes WP:GNG. Google News search in Japanese: [1]. -- Moscow Connection ( talk) 12:36, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Fails NFOOTY, but passes wider GNG. Significant, non-routine coverage can be found within the article already. The fact that this is based on her looks / appearance rather than her footballing achievements is not relevant. Fenix down ( talk) 08:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There is surprisingly quite a bit on her on the web and she does seem to pass GNG in my opinion. Govvy ( talk) 20:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - subject fails WP:NFOOTY but that is irrelevant as she passes WP:GNG anyway, even though most of the coverage is for a pretty trivial reason. Inter&anthro ( talk) 02:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete she fails NFOOTY, so the GNG is less relevant for sourcing about here career: we can assume it is routine. In terms of the GNG for things that are trivial: if it is trivial coverage simply about her looks, I wouldn't count that as meeting the GNG.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
15:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Did you even look at the sources? Articles like this are not "trivial coverage", that's practically a finished encyclopedic article about her. -- Moscow Connection ( talk) 03:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- That makes no sense Tony. Just because someone dosent pass NFOOTY doesnt mean they can't pass GNG. Passing NFOOTY presumes passing GNG, but it is not true to say that failing NFOOTY presumes failing GNG. Further comments from other editors about coverage being trivial concerns the fact that coverage focuses on her looks rather than her footballing skill not being trivial in terms of depth. Fenix down ( talk) 07:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 19:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 19:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Strong keep Although it's true she fails WP:NFOOTY for now, she clearly passes WP:GNG with multiple sourced providing in-depth coverage of her career (starting with this article that Moscow Connection already pointed out). NFOOTY is just used to suggest that players who pass the guideline might be notable, but someone passing GNG confirms notability. JTtheOG ( talk) 07:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - I tend to agree that she fails WP:NFOOTY but passes WP:GNG. -- Dane talk 03:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - While her rise to fame comes from her soccer career, but as shown by others in this discussion, she has had significant coverage in Japan in regards to her, enough to pass GNG. WikiVirus C (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.