- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:58, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Avenida Plaza ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Building development that fails WP:GNG. In fact, it doesn't even exist as the article says it is an "upcoming" development. There is no in-depth coverage to satisfy notability. G11 already declined. CNMall41 ( talk) 03:03, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:09, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:09, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete On top of failing WP:GNG it seems almost promotional with the "Restaurants" section included in there. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thought so too. I went G11 but it was declined unfortunately. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 03:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Concur with nom. One reference to a future development does not confer notability. MB 03:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:58, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Avenida Plaza ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Building development that fails WP:GNG. In fact, it doesn't even exist as the article says it is an "upcoming" development. There is no in-depth coverage to satisfy notability. G11 already declined. CNMall41 ( talk) 03:03, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:09, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:09, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete On top of failing WP:GNG it seems almost promotional with the "Restaurants" section included in there. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thought so too. I went G11 but it was declined unfortunately. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 03:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Concur with nom. One reference to a future development does not confer notability. MB 03:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.