- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 22:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Avaye Honar
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Avaye Honar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Searching "آوای هنـــر" and "Avaye Honar" doesn't seem to bring much to suggest that this would pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. It has a brief bio at Genius and a Facebook page with 133 followers. Most other hits are either primary sources or about something that is nothing to do with this record label. For example there is 'Avaye Honar Gallery' and 'Avaye Honar Institute of Music' both of which seem to be more notable than this record label. Spiderone 13:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete we need something other than a subjects website to show notability. The really scary thing is that probably a majority of articles on record labels have this level of sourcing or just a little more. We have lots of areas in Wikipedia with articles that lack adequate sourcing. It is a daunting taks to fix these issues, which are in large part a relic of our uncontrolled build policies that existed for the first 5 years of the project, and even when we started to form definite limits of inclusion in 2006, what people saw was reckless almost limitless inclusion in practice, and repeated more what they saw than what our policies advised. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed. I think I went far enough down the rabbit hole when I found this article. Not sure I want to venture too much further! Spiderone 16:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and JPL. Facebook and genius are not reliable either. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 10:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Deleteneeds further expansion and references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brilliantfire ( talk • contribs) 11:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 22:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Avaye Honar
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Avaye Honar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Searching "آوای هنـــر" and "Avaye Honar" doesn't seem to bring much to suggest that this would pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. It has a brief bio at Genius and a Facebook page with 133 followers. Most other hits are either primary sources or about something that is nothing to do with this record label. For example there is 'Avaye Honar Gallery' and 'Avaye Honar Institute of Music' both of which seem to be more notable than this record label. Spiderone 13:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete we need something other than a subjects website to show notability. The really scary thing is that probably a majority of articles on record labels have this level of sourcing or just a little more. We have lots of areas in Wikipedia with articles that lack adequate sourcing. It is a daunting taks to fix these issues, which are in large part a relic of our uncontrolled build policies that existed for the first 5 years of the project, and even when we started to form definite limits of inclusion in 2006, what people saw was reckless almost limitless inclusion in practice, and repeated more what they saw than what our policies advised. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed. I think I went far enough down the rabbit hole when I found this article. Not sure I want to venture too much further! Spiderone 16:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and JPL. Facebook and genius are not reliable either. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 10:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Deleteneeds further expansion and references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brilliantfire ( talk • contribs) 11:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.