The result was Snowball delete. Note to all those describing this as admin negligence - the article was deleted five days after the prod notice was placed on it. This deletion was then contested and the article was restored without the prod notice, as per standard procedures. As such it needed an AfD nomination to be again considered for deletion. There was no tardiness or negligence on anyone's part in this process Grutness... wha? 02:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod (prod removed after 12 days of being uncontested). There is no need for an article of this type. The information is practically all duplicated from Australia national under-23 football team, 2007 Lunar New Year Cup, Football at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's qualification and Football at the 2008 Summer Olympics. Anyone can see Australia's involvement in the Olympics from those articles, so there is no need for a separate article just about them. Nfitz ( talk) 19:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Snowball delete. Note to all those describing this as admin negligence - the article was deleted five days after the prod notice was placed on it. This deletion was then contested and the article was restored without the prod notice, as per standard procedures. As such it needed an AfD nomination to be again considered for deletion. There was no tardiness or negligence on anyone's part in this process Grutness... wha? 02:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod (prod removed after 12 days of being uncontested). There is no need for an article of this type. The information is practically all duplicated from Australia national under-23 football team, 2007 Lunar New Year Cup, Football at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's qualification and Football at the 2008 Summer Olympics. Anyone can see Australia's involvement in the Olympics from those articles, so there is no need for a separate article just about them. Nfitz ( talk) 19:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC) reply