The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 07:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Biography with no assertion of notability; all sources appear to be self-published or primary. Reads like a puff piece, which triggered warning bells in my head. Does not appear to meet criteria at
WP:FILMMAKER.
Axem Titanium (
talk) 01:37, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment. Agreed, but the awards and nominations suggest notability. Lazz_R 17:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)reply
I'm not certain the
SATO 48 is a notable award. The article itself has no references and it seems to be some kind of local amateur film festival? I'm not certain how to evaluate the Shorty Awards, other than that they exist. Do people know or care about them? Does winning one confer notability? Regardless, the awards section of McConnell's article is clearly notability-hacking.
Axem Titanium (
talk) 20:08, 19 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Does not appear to meet the requirements for notability, fails
WP:ARTIST.
HighKing++ 14:04, 26 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 07:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Biography with no assertion of notability; all sources appear to be self-published or primary. Reads like a puff piece, which triggered warning bells in my head. Does not appear to meet criteria at
WP:FILMMAKER.
Axem Titanium (
talk) 01:37, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment. Agreed, but the awards and nominations suggest notability. Lazz_R 17:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)reply
I'm not certain the
SATO 48 is a notable award. The article itself has no references and it seems to be some kind of local amateur film festival? I'm not certain how to evaluate the Shorty Awards, other than that they exist. Do people know or care about them? Does winning one confer notability? Regardless, the awards section of McConnell's article is clearly notability-hacking.
Axem Titanium (
talk) 20:08, 19 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Does not appear to meet the requirements for notability, fails
WP:ARTIST.
HighKing++ 14:04, 26 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.