The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:GNG: No sources for either English transliterated title, or original Telugu title. All other linked websites are database entries. This may be from a significant actor or a prolific director, but it can't stand on its own as it is. –eggofreason(
talk ·
contribs)05:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Additional comment: Some points at
WP:NFILM might help this stand if any contemporary criticism of the film was found, but as said, I came across practically nothing for this film. Regardless, this article fails on all other of NFILM's points (including GNG/RS) based on my searching. –eggofreason(
talk ·
contribs)05:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete The fact that there are notable actors does not establish notability for this film as notability isn't inherited. With that said, other than the one review mentioned I could find nothing of substance. Lots of links to databases, youtube videos, and other sites that fail all of the reliability requirements. Saying that it satisfies
#1 of other evidence of notability is wrong, because that clearly states "received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics." and we can only find one. You cannot assume that there is more.
Donaldd23 (
talk)
21:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
While I agree that at least two known reviews are needed, it cannot be assumed that they do not exist because they are not available online. Its unfortunate that most Indian Newspapers do not store content before 2000s. Even if they were, Google search does a terrible job when it comes to Indian languages. I've tried to preset whatever I could find by searching manually. --
Ab207 (
talk)
08:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Indeed, we cannot assume that sources don't exist because they're not online. But it remains the case that in order to keep the article, those sources need to be produced, and they need to be verifiable by other editors. No prejudice against recreation if sources appear at a later date, but right now, this doesn't meet the GNG.
Ravenswing 07:10, 15 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:GNG: No sources for either English transliterated title, or original Telugu title. All other linked websites are database entries. This may be from a significant actor or a prolific director, but it can't stand on its own as it is. –eggofreason(
talk ·
contribs)05:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Additional comment: Some points at
WP:NFILM might help this stand if any contemporary criticism of the film was found, but as said, I came across practically nothing for this film. Regardless, this article fails on all other of NFILM's points (including GNG/RS) based on my searching. –eggofreason(
talk ·
contribs)05:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete The fact that there are notable actors does not establish notability for this film as notability isn't inherited. With that said, other than the one review mentioned I could find nothing of substance. Lots of links to databases, youtube videos, and other sites that fail all of the reliability requirements. Saying that it satisfies
#1 of other evidence of notability is wrong, because that clearly states "received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics." and we can only find one. You cannot assume that there is more.
Donaldd23 (
talk)
21:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
While I agree that at least two known reviews are needed, it cannot be assumed that they do not exist because they are not available online. Its unfortunate that most Indian Newspapers do not store content before 2000s. Even if they were, Google search does a terrible job when it comes to Indian languages. I've tried to preset whatever I could find by searching manually. --
Ab207 (
talk)
08:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Indeed, we cannot assume that sources don't exist because they're not online. But it remains the case that in order to keep the article, those sources need to be produced, and they need to be verifiable by other editors. No prejudice against recreation if sources appear at a later date, but right now, this doesn't meet the GNG.
Ravenswing 07:10, 15 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.