The result was not appropriate for Afd. I am closing this Afd so soon after it was relisted because it has become clear from the comments below that this is not actually appropriate for Afd, after all. The desired result of the original nominator will not be achieved in this forum. For one thing, there is a naming dispute that is intertwined with this discussion. Everybody agrees that the object of this discussion deserves an article. The main question seems to be: "What should we name it?" and then, "What titles should redirect to it?" The correct process to follow here is: 1) Decide where the article should be located. (This discussion is currently happening on the talk page at Talk:Nestorian_Stele#Requested_move.) 2) Once the naming dispute is resolved, if there are any redirects that editors feel violate policy, then they should be nominated for deletion at Redirects for discussion. Any arguments about original research, etc., can then be brought up there. Aervanath ( talk) 06:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The last Afd for this article was closed as redirect to Nestorian Stele. After a discussion at Deletion review (see Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_February_1), it was decided to relist the article for another deletion debate. I am personally neutral on the topic, and completely disinterested. Aervanath ( talk) 18:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was not appropriate for Afd. I am closing this Afd so soon after it was relisted because it has become clear from the comments below that this is not actually appropriate for Afd, after all. The desired result of the original nominator will not be achieved in this forum. For one thing, there is a naming dispute that is intertwined with this discussion. Everybody agrees that the object of this discussion deserves an article. The main question seems to be: "What should we name it?" and then, "What titles should redirect to it?" The correct process to follow here is: 1) Decide where the article should be located. (This discussion is currently happening on the talk page at Talk:Nestorian_Stele#Requested_move.) 2) Once the naming dispute is resolved, if there are any redirects that editors feel violate policy, then they should be nominated for deletion at Redirects for discussion. Any arguments about original research, etc., can then be brought up there. Aervanath ( talk) 06:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The last Afd for this article was closed as redirect to Nestorian Stele. After a discussion at Deletion review (see Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_February_1), it was decided to relist the article for another deletion debate. I am personally neutral on the topic, and completely disinterested. Aervanath ( talk) 18:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC) reply