The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A non-notable "school" that has no accreditation and absolutely no coverage. CHRISSYMAD❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete I was actually going to vote keep, then I realized that
the Assam Institute of Technology is a completely different organization. AICT seems to be a training facility for Assam Electronics Development Corporation Limited (at least, based on
this).
Primefac (
talk) 23:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete The institute is not actually a school or college. It is a privately held "coaching classes", under "Electronics Development Corporation Ltd." which is a private company. The institute is not accredited by
University Grants Commission (India), or any other government organisations. There are hundreds of such institutes in every average sized city of India. Nothing notable about this particular institute. And then there is lack complete absence of reliable sources. —usernamekiran
(talk) 16:40, 5 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as a non-notable for-profit company that fails to meet our guidelines on inclusion.
TonyBallioni (
talk) 20:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: No different from the three non-notable corporate training programs where I have taught engineering and electronics. --
Guy Macon (
talk) 19:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - Fails
WP:ORG.-
MrX 13:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: Clearly fails
WP:GNG and
WP:ORG. Probably should have been deleted A7, as there is no claim of significance (credible or not) in the article.
Waggie (
talk) 16:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A non-notable "school" that has no accreditation and absolutely no coverage. CHRISSYMAD❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete I was actually going to vote keep, then I realized that
the Assam Institute of Technology is a completely different organization. AICT seems to be a training facility for Assam Electronics Development Corporation Limited (at least, based on
this).
Primefac (
talk) 23:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete The institute is not actually a school or college. It is a privately held "coaching classes", under "Electronics Development Corporation Ltd." which is a private company. The institute is not accredited by
University Grants Commission (India), or any other government organisations. There are hundreds of such institutes in every average sized city of India. Nothing notable about this particular institute. And then there is lack complete absence of reliable sources. —usernamekiran
(talk) 16:40, 5 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as a non-notable for-profit company that fails to meet our guidelines on inclusion.
TonyBallioni (
talk) 20:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: No different from the three non-notable corporate training programs where I have taught engineering and electronics. --
Guy Macon (
talk) 19:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - Fails
WP:ORG.-
MrX 13:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: Clearly fails
WP:GNG and
WP:ORG. Probably should have been deleted A7, as there is no claim of significance (credible or not) in the article.
Waggie (
talk) 16:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.