The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The article was earlier deleted after a general consensus in AfD. The creator added the middle name which conceals the article deletion history. Neurofreak ( talk) 13:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Comment: Most of the references are from unreliable sources. Since, the article was earlier deleted through AfD ( Ashish Chanchlani), admins should prevent it from recreating by tagging WP:SALT. Following is a list of unreliable/blogs/spam/gossip sources used in the article:
Unreliable
Gossip/blogposts
Uncategorized/spam?
Comment on reliable sources Most of the reliable sources are trivial mentions and others like, Hindustan Times are paid 'BRAND-POST' as per the website. [1] [2] Deccan Herald reference is an interview. [3] The Times of India (TOI) reference [4] is a one-liner "news" about the subject's casting in a web series, and another TOI reference is just a picture of him with a popular music composer. [5] Neurofreak ( talk) 14:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
The current version is completely different from previously deleted(maybe, but that's hardly a claim to notability in itself; having "different" sources != "better" sources), notices of HOAX material and wild claims as to "DMySon"'s better sources, are all arguments to avoid. G4 may not in its strictest sense apply, but the [last AfD] was SNOWclosed and I can see why. Since they have the right to know their previous !votes are being circumvented, pinging those who commented ther but haven't yet commented here—whichever way they !voted, per WP:CANVAS— User:Ab207, User:Pharaoh of the Wizards, User:Bonadea, User:Bmf 051, User:Aguy777 and User:hako9. —— Serial 13:41, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
"All the resources you mentioned above, are significant, reliable and independent of the subject. Clearly passes the WP:RS"That's absolute not accurate. Two of them are Hindustan Times "Brand-Post", which are press releases. Open the page source and search for "brand-post" and you'll see the other PR buzzwords. Press releases are not articles, and they are not independent of the subject. The Deccan Herald source is an interview, which I'm sure DMySon knows, would also not be independent of the subject, since it obviously involves him, and would be a primary source. This appears to be another press-release style "article". It certainly has no depth of coverage about the subject, merely just announcing a project he's going to do. The last one, a slideshow says nothing of substance about the subject. I also dislike slideshows, because we never know if it was assembled by a journalist or an intern, or something else.
"His web series "Class of 2017" (if I remember correctly) has its own article and is notable, which makes him notable."This conflicts with the community's general attitude that notability is not inherited.
"With reliable sources indicated by DMySon, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG"lacks any substantive argument about which sources meet which qualifications.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The article was earlier deleted after a general consensus in AfD. The creator added the middle name which conceals the article deletion history. Neurofreak ( talk) 13:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Comment: Most of the references are from unreliable sources. Since, the article was earlier deleted through AfD ( Ashish Chanchlani), admins should prevent it from recreating by tagging WP:SALT. Following is a list of unreliable/blogs/spam/gossip sources used in the article:
Unreliable
Gossip/blogposts
Uncategorized/spam?
Comment on reliable sources Most of the reliable sources are trivial mentions and others like, Hindustan Times are paid 'BRAND-POST' as per the website. [1] [2] Deccan Herald reference is an interview. [3] The Times of India (TOI) reference [4] is a one-liner "news" about the subject's casting in a web series, and another TOI reference is just a picture of him with a popular music composer. [5] Neurofreak ( talk) 14:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
The current version is completely different from previously deleted(maybe, but that's hardly a claim to notability in itself; having "different" sources != "better" sources), notices of HOAX material and wild claims as to "DMySon"'s better sources, are all arguments to avoid. G4 may not in its strictest sense apply, but the [last AfD] was SNOWclosed and I can see why. Since they have the right to know their previous !votes are being circumvented, pinging those who commented ther but haven't yet commented here—whichever way they !voted, per WP:CANVAS— User:Ab207, User:Pharaoh of the Wizards, User:Bonadea, User:Bmf 051, User:Aguy777 and User:hako9. —— Serial 13:41, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
"All the resources you mentioned above, are significant, reliable and independent of the subject. Clearly passes the WP:RS"That's absolute not accurate. Two of them are Hindustan Times "Brand-Post", which are press releases. Open the page source and search for "brand-post" and you'll see the other PR buzzwords. Press releases are not articles, and they are not independent of the subject. The Deccan Herald source is an interview, which I'm sure DMySon knows, would also not be independent of the subject, since it obviously involves him, and would be a primary source. This appears to be another press-release style "article". It certainly has no depth of coverage about the subject, merely just announcing a project he's going to do. The last one, a slideshow says nothing of substance about the subject. I also dislike slideshows, because we never know if it was assembled by a journalist or an intern, or something else.
"His web series "Class of 2017" (if I remember correctly) has its own article and is notable, which makes him notable."This conflicts with the community's general attitude that notability is not inherited.
"With reliable sources indicated by DMySon, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG"lacks any substantive argument about which sources meet which qualifications.