The result was keep. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Despite over six months passing since last AfD, no apparent progress has been made on this, nor has any evidence emerged to suggest that it passes the future film notability guidelines. Article presently seems to be promotional in tone and intention. If notability is solely contingent on fundraising, then this is not a notable film, it's a notable marketing method, no? Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 15:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Despite over six months passing since last AfD, no apparent progress has been made on this, nor has any evidence emerged to suggest that it passes the future film notability guidelines. Article presently seems to be promotional in tone and intention. If notability is solely contingent on fundraising, then this is not a notable film, it's a notable marketing method, no? Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 15:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC) reply