The result was keep. Discussions regarding clean up and article name can occur on regular talk page using the regular procedure. ( non-admin closure) Atmoz ( talk) 15:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
tl;dr overloaded with synthesis. Almost none of this has anything to do with archaeology (the first several sections deal with animals!), so there's also blatant coatracking. Many sections tagged with OR. If kept, chainsaw it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 01:18, 20 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Weak keep - So far as I can see, there isn't excessive bloating in the "independent science and the Book of Mormon" field, just this article and the linguistics article. Having said that, I wonder whether an article of that type might not be a better place for both topics, as having a single article might help prevent the bloating described by others. John Carter ( talk) 19:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Discussions regarding clean up and article name can occur on regular talk page using the regular procedure. ( non-admin closure) Atmoz ( talk) 15:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
tl;dr overloaded with synthesis. Almost none of this has anything to do with archaeology (the first several sections deal with animals!), so there's also blatant coatracking. Many sections tagged with OR. If kept, chainsaw it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 01:18, 20 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Weak keep - So far as I can see, there isn't excessive bloating in the "independent science and the Book of Mormon" field, just this article and the linguistics article. Having said that, I wonder whether an article of that type might not be a better place for both topics, as having a single article might help prevent the bloating described by others. John Carter ( talk) 19:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC) reply