The result was keep per WP:SNOW. ( non-admin closure) Ian P. Tetriss ( talk) 14:44, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No source focuses solely on the Arbitration Committee. Fourmidable ( talk) 17:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:4228b090-8900-4a29-baa3-660300cdd283/files/r5d86p1071 | peer-reviewed | very much so | ✔ Yes | |
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/fake-news-wikipedia-arbitration-committee | ✔ Yes | |||
https://www.wsj.com/articles/when-wikipedias-bickering-editors-go-to-war-its-supreme-court-steps-in-1525708429 | ✔ Yes | |||
https://slate.com/technology/2019/07/wikipedia-fram-banning-editor-controversy.html | ~ Some mentions about the nature of ArbCom. | ~ Partial | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The study was actually very interesting, I recommend to anyone interested to have a read. NotAGenious ( talk) 14:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. ( non-admin closure) Ian P. Tetriss ( talk) 14:44, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No source focuses solely on the Arbitration Committee. Fourmidable ( talk) 17:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:4228b090-8900-4a29-baa3-660300cdd283/files/r5d86p1071 | peer-reviewed | very much so | ✔ Yes | |
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/fake-news-wikipedia-arbitration-committee | ✔ Yes | |||
https://www.wsj.com/articles/when-wikipedias-bickering-editors-go-to-war-its-supreme-court-steps-in-1525708429 | ✔ Yes | |||
https://slate.com/technology/2019/07/wikipedia-fram-banning-editor-controversy.html | ~ Some mentions about the nature of ArbCom. | ~ Partial | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The study was actually very interesting, I recommend to anyone interested to have a read. NotAGenious ( talk) 14:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)