The result was delete. TOOSOON. Tone 17:14, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Stub in JP wiki, definitely WP:TOOSOON. Subject has nothing substantial to write about, nor does he have enough siginificant roles. When will people learn that having well-referenced paragraphs is less likely gonna have their articles AFDed? Let's go ahead and write one liner stubs on every seiyu ever, shall we? Sk8erPrince ( talk) 09:50, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic. If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate page, but should instead be merged into an article about a larger topic or relevant list.From the same guideline:
Because these requirements are based on major content policies, they apply to all articles, not solely articles justified under the general notability criteria.This is what I am talking about when it's regarding the fact that there is practically nothing to write about for this subject. So yes, the lack of material to write about the subject *does* matter. It's not something I've made up.
People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.You say that the subject is presumed notable because he meets WP:ENT, but that is just a presumption, not a guarantee, which I will elaborate below.
People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included.See? There is no guarantee, especially if the subject does not even meet WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. I've said my piece. I will now wait for other users to chime in. Sk8erPrince ( talk) 16:22, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. TOOSOON. Tone 17:14, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Stub in JP wiki, definitely WP:TOOSOON. Subject has nothing substantial to write about, nor does he have enough siginificant roles. When will people learn that having well-referenced paragraphs is less likely gonna have their articles AFDed? Let's go ahead and write one liner stubs on every seiyu ever, shall we? Sk8erPrince ( talk) 09:50, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic. If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate page, but should instead be merged into an article about a larger topic or relevant list.From the same guideline:
Because these requirements are based on major content policies, they apply to all articles, not solely articles justified under the general notability criteria.This is what I am talking about when it's regarding the fact that there is practically nothing to write about for this subject. So yes, the lack of material to write about the subject *does* matter. It's not something I've made up.
People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.You say that the subject is presumed notable because he meets WP:ENT, but that is just a presumption, not a guarantee, which I will elaborate below.
People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included.See? There is no guarantee, especially if the subject does not even meet WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. I've said my piece. I will now wait for other users to chime in. Sk8erPrince ( talk) 16:22, 17 September 2019 (UTC)