- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Anusit Termmee
- Anusit Termmee ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD contested, no reason provided. Original rationale remains valid - this young player has not received significant coverage (failing WP:GNG) and has not played in a fully-professional league (failing WP:NFOOTBALL). Giant Snowman 08:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:53, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - per GS, a young player, so probably WP:TOOSOON. Fenix down ( talk) 13:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 14:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
I can think the authors uses the data that is correct actually and person ( minus,erase ) show the referent that don't suit the reason such as , he is person play , fully league , then get ( minus,erase ) which , be lieeing has and to oppose at the authors write. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kengi1982 ( talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Anusit Termmee
- Anusit Termmee ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD contested, no reason provided. Original rationale remains valid - this young player has not received significant coverage (failing WP:GNG) and has not played in a fully-professional league (failing WP:NFOOTBALL). Giant Snowman 08:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:53, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - per GS, a young player, so probably WP:TOOSOON. Fenix down ( talk) 13:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 14:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
I can think the authors uses the data that is correct actually and person ( minus,erase ) show the referent that don't suit the reason such as , he is person play , fully league , then get ( minus,erase ) which , be lieeing has and to oppose at the authors write. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kengi1982 ( talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.