- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 03:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Antonietta Cornelia Vetterlein
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Antonietta Cornelia Vetterlein ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only claim to notability that I can see is the painting in the Gallery of Beauties, which I do not think sufficient; a redirect to the article seems quite enough. And the same proably holds for some at least of the other women listed.
TheLongTone ( talk) 15:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Royalty and nobility, and Germany. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: WP:COMMONNAME appears to be Cornelia Vetterlein. Curbon7 ( talk) 20:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Gallery of Beauties. Also retarget Cornelia Vetterlein there. Jahaza ( talk) 21:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep (as Cornelia Vetterlein). She seems to have been a significant figure. The article could be expanded with other biographical material such as
this.--
Ipigott (
talk)
11:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Anything else? I get an error 404 when I try your link TheLongTone ( talk) 13:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep as a historical interest, she has had a long enough entry in the Cosmopolitan - Page 455. Cheer. IP God 007 ( talk) 21:44, 15 September 2023 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE – Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 18:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:BASIC considering sources linked in this discussion: [1] and [2], and another source here: [3]. — siro χ o 05:46, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep but rename to Cornelia Vetterlein, as she was a historical beauty, discussed by scholars. 62.181.221.7 ( talk) 08:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE – Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 18:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 03:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Antonietta Cornelia Vetterlein
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Antonietta Cornelia Vetterlein ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only claim to notability that I can see is the painting in the Gallery of Beauties, which I do not think sufficient; a redirect to the article seems quite enough. And the same proably holds for some at least of the other women listed.
TheLongTone ( talk) 15:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Royalty and nobility, and Germany. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: WP:COMMONNAME appears to be Cornelia Vetterlein. Curbon7 ( talk) 20:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Gallery of Beauties. Also retarget Cornelia Vetterlein there. Jahaza ( talk) 21:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep (as Cornelia Vetterlein). She seems to have been a significant figure. The article could be expanded with other biographical material such as
this.--
Ipigott (
talk)
11:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Anything else? I get an error 404 when I try your link TheLongTone ( talk) 13:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep as a historical interest, she has had a long enough entry in the Cosmopolitan - Page 455. Cheer. IP God 007 ( talk) 21:44, 15 September 2023 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE – Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 18:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:BASIC considering sources linked in this discussion: [1] and [2], and another source here: [3]. — siro χ o 05:46, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep but rename to Cornelia Vetterlein, as she was a historical beauty, discussed by scholars. 62.181.221.7 ( talk) 08:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE – Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 18:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.