The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Non-notable subject/individual, as well as very limited sources (mostly non-reliable and/or primary sources). The contest in which the individual won, Miss Supranational, is also considered a non-notable beauty pageant competition on Wikipedia, as evidenced by the lack of an article entry on said contest and any related articles, on English Wikipedia. Thanks.
Delete: Per consensus that Miss Supranational is non-notable. I believe the pageant community here should be very proactive about these non-notable articles being created so often, as it's a major problem.
{ [ ( jjj1238 ) ] } 01:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. The sole point apparently asserted for notability is one that does not provide it, and the subject is not well-sourced to reliable sources.
BD2412T 05:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Delete if the competition is not notable than winning it does not make one notable. The reverse is not neccesarily true.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 19:19, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment: Naturally, her winning the title has generated plenty of media coverage, and she has appeared on TV talk shows like
this one. I'm not sure whether they're in-depth enough to satisfy GNG though. --
Paul_012 (
talk) 05:08, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Non-notable subject/individual, as well as very limited sources (mostly non-reliable and/or primary sources). The contest in which the individual won, Miss Supranational, is also considered a non-notable beauty pageant competition on Wikipedia, as evidenced by the lack of an article entry on said contest and any related articles, on English Wikipedia. Thanks.
Delete: Per consensus that Miss Supranational is non-notable. I believe the pageant community here should be very proactive about these non-notable articles being created so often, as it's a major problem.
{ [ ( jjj1238 ) ] } 01:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. The sole point apparently asserted for notability is one that does not provide it, and the subject is not well-sourced to reliable sources.
BD2412T 05:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Delete if the competition is not notable than winning it does not make one notable. The reverse is not neccesarily true.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 19:19, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment: Naturally, her winning the title has generated plenty of media coverage, and she has appeared on TV talk shows like
this one. I'm not sure whether they're in-depth enough to satisfy GNG though. --
Paul_012 (
talk) 05:08, 24 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.