The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Absolutely no presentation of any case for notability. WP:NOTGENEALOGY totally applies here - she was born in 1640, she was in a family, she was one of a number of sisters who joined a movement, she died. No notability in text or sources. Fails WP:GNG.
Alexandermcnabb (
talk)
04:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Digitaal Vrouwenlexicon van Nederland is the name of the
biographical dictionary in which the six-paragraph biography appears. Wikipedia's notability criteria don't require great feats or acts of consequence. Instead, we delegate the determination of notability to reliable sources. If a prominent tertiary source such as DVN has taken note of van Aerssen, then so also should we.
pburka (
talk)
16:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:ANYBIO. Nominators should be especially careful in nominating for deletion articles about women, when their contributions are regularly underrepresented in historical sources, a fact which the
Digitaal Vrouwenlexicon van Nederland already sought to remedy, so let's not disregard that important work.
Jahaza (
talk)
05:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep -- The sources clearly include Dutch biographical disctionaries. It is long established that people with articles in such works are notable.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
16:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Absolutely no presentation of any case for notability. WP:NOTGENEALOGY totally applies here - she was born in 1640, she was in a family, she was one of a number of sisters who joined a movement, she died. No notability in text or sources. Fails WP:GNG.
Alexandermcnabb (
talk)
04:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Digitaal Vrouwenlexicon van Nederland is the name of the
biographical dictionary in which the six-paragraph biography appears. Wikipedia's notability criteria don't require great feats or acts of consequence. Instead, we delegate the determination of notability to reliable sources. If a prominent tertiary source such as DVN has taken note of van Aerssen, then so also should we.
pburka (
talk)
16:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:ANYBIO. Nominators should be especially careful in nominating for deletion articles about women, when their contributions are regularly underrepresented in historical sources, a fact which the
Digitaal Vrouwenlexicon van Nederland already sought to remedy, so let's not disregard that important work.
Jahaza (
talk)
05:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep -- The sources clearly include Dutch biographical disctionaries. It is long established that people with articles in such works are notable.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
16:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.