- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Animaker ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm doubting that the software is notable based on the sources cited. -- Beland ( talk) 07:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Beland ( talk) 07:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- USNews lists it as "Best Basic Web-Based Animation Software", which is something, I guess Aaron Liu ( talk) 11:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I can only find tutorials on how to use the software, nothing about critical reviews or discussions in RS. None of the sources in the article now are RS, some appear to be PR items. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Animaker ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm doubting that the software is notable based on the sources cited. -- Beland ( talk) 07:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Beland ( talk) 07:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- USNews lists it as "Best Basic Web-Based Animation Software", which is something, I guess Aaron Liu ( talk) 11:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I can only find tutorials on how to use the software, nothing about critical reviews or discussions in RS. None of the sources in the article now are RS, some appear to be PR items. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.