The result was delete. Participation is fairly low, but Msnicki has offered an analysis of the sources that illustrates why they don't meet the requirements for independence or significance. Sjakkalle (Check!) 19:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject has dubious claim to notability. Tagged for notability since October. No evidence that books Farrell wrote were published. Article looks like a vanity piece, likely created by the subject of the article. BlackCab ( talk) 10:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Participation is fairly low, but Msnicki has offered an analysis of the sources that illustrates why they don't meet the requirements for independence or significance. Sjakkalle (Check!) 19:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Subject has dubious claim to notability. Tagged for notability since October. No evidence that books Farrell wrote were published. Article looks like a vanity piece, likely created by the subject of the article. BlackCab ( talk) 10:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC) reply