- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No notability, and WP:BIODELETE (kind of) applies anyways. ansh 666 07:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Andy Newell
- Andy Newell ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A family member of Andy Newell has been in touch via the OTRS system and informed us that he died in 2014, asking if the article can be updated to reflect this. The family member was not aware of any reliable sources reporting Newell's death, and my own searches have not revealed any either. The article has lacked sources for many years and coverage to demonstrate notability seems to be lacking. Cordless Larry ( talk) 15:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- I forgot to note in my nomination that I explained to the family member that I intended to nominate the article for deletion, and that they agree that it is better to have no article rather than a poorly sourced one. I also explained that, should sources subsequently emerge, it might be possible to create a new article. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:06, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete the sources just do not add up to notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Stop relisting it. Delete Per the noms well reasoned argument, and not finding anything to the contrary. Α Guy into Books™ § ( Message) - 20:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The relists were correct and proper, and anyway the third is usually the last. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No notability, and WP:BIODELETE (kind of) applies anyways. ansh 666 07:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Andy Newell
- Andy Newell ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A family member of Andy Newell has been in touch via the OTRS system and informed us that he died in 2014, asking if the article can be updated to reflect this. The family member was not aware of any reliable sources reporting Newell's death, and my own searches have not revealed any either. The article has lacked sources for many years and coverage to demonstrate notability seems to be lacking. Cordless Larry ( talk) 15:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- I forgot to note in my nomination that I explained to the family member that I intended to nominate the article for deletion, and that they agree that it is better to have no article rather than a poorly sourced one. I also explained that, should sources subsequently emerge, it might be possible to create a new article. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:06, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete the sources just do not add up to notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Stop relisting it. Delete Per the noms well reasoned argument, and not finding anything to the contrary. Α Guy into Books™ § ( Message) - 20:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The relists were correct and proper, and anyway the third is usually the last. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.