The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Jenks24 (
talk) 11:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The page appears to be largely promotional and taken from the andrewfranck.net website. The references consist largely of primary source material. I tried to establish his notability esp. on the music front without success.
Karst (
talk) 13:59, 14 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 00:54, 30 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - The references are dead or do not reference the subject at all or only tangentially. None are reliable sources of notability.--
Rpclod (
talk) 02:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - The evidence for this article's promotional nature is overwhelming. The original author's
contributions page is highly suspicious, including the removal of a prod and an orphan tag. The account only has one mainspace edit outside of the article in question. -
LordBromblemore 21:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Jenks24 (
talk) 11:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The page appears to be largely promotional and taken from the andrewfranck.net website. The references consist largely of primary source material. I tried to establish his notability esp. on the music front without success.
Karst (
talk) 13:59, 14 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 00:54, 30 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - The references are dead or do not reference the subject at all or only tangentially. None are reliable sources of notability.--
Rpclod (
talk) 02:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - The evidence for this article's promotional nature is overwhelming. The original author's
contributions page is highly suspicious, including the removal of a prod and an orphan tag. The account only has one mainspace edit outside of the article in question. -
LordBromblemore 21:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.