The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 02:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable - has not met either criteria of: 1. The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times. 2. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field Reichsfürst ( talk) 16:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC) reply
I am looking to satisfy GNG in every way I can and work along with the community here. There are over 50,000 senior PR professionals in the UK. With respect, the PR Week PowerBook is not a phone book at all, it represents the editorial team’s collective view of the sub 1% it feels are the most important and notable. More references can be added to independent, respected trade publications. Is there a precedent for the trade publication of record for an industry sector to be seen to fail GNG? What about an independent Who's Who? What is the definition of mainstream media and does this exclude trade or special interest media?-- JaySorrels ( talk) 18:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Finally, the conflict of interest here is serious; you admit to being an employee of Bloch's in charge of digital matters. Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest strongly discourages you from creating or editing articles where the conflict applies, for just this situation: "How do I find some rule under which we can sneak my boss' article through?" rather than "Does this subject qualify for an article?" ῲ Ravenswing ῴ 19:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 02:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable - has not met either criteria of: 1. The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times. 2. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field Reichsfürst ( talk) 16:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC) reply
I am looking to satisfy GNG in every way I can and work along with the community here. There are over 50,000 senior PR professionals in the UK. With respect, the PR Week PowerBook is not a phone book at all, it represents the editorial team’s collective view of the sub 1% it feels are the most important and notable. More references can be added to independent, respected trade publications. Is there a precedent for the trade publication of record for an industry sector to be seen to fail GNG? What about an independent Who's Who? What is the definition of mainstream media and does this exclude trade or special interest media?-- JaySorrels ( talk) 18:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Finally, the conflict of interest here is serious; you admit to being an employee of Bloch's in charge of digital matters. Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest strongly discourages you from creating or editing articles where the conflict applies, for just this situation: "How do I find some rule under which we can sneak my boss' article through?" rather than "Does this subject qualify for an article?" ῲ Ravenswing ῴ 19:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC) reply