- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Andrew Barnes nz ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article doesn't seem to establish WP:GNG, huge number of reference links that appear to be irrelevant ads (page creator has apparently created multiple such pages), reads like a press release puff piece. Assuming GNG can be met, at a minimum needs a serious pruning and full re-write but doesn't look encyclopedic. JamesG5 ( talk) 05:55, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete There is a slim possiblity that somewhere in this truly awful article there is something that might scrape past GNG, but I doubt it.
- Delete Mattlore ( talk) 21:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Andrew Barnes nz ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article doesn't seem to establish WP:GNG, huge number of reference links that appear to be irrelevant ads (page creator has apparently created multiple such pages), reads like a press release puff piece. Assuming GNG can be met, at a minimum needs a serious pruning and full re-write but doesn't look encyclopedic. JamesG5 ( talk) 05:55, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete There is a slim possiblity that somewhere in this truly awful article there is something that might scrape past GNG, but I doubt it.
- Delete Mattlore ( talk) 21:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.