- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Anarkali of Arrah
- Anarkali of Arrah ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails to meet either the general notability guidelines or the specifc guidelines, appears to be too early for there to be notability regarding this Amortias ( T)( C) 19:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - I found a number of sources that discuss the movie, or at least casting for the movie. It's not a whole lot, but there does appear to be enough coverage to establish notability for the film. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 05:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 05:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 05:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Too Soon. ChunnuBhai ( talk) 03:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 00:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 00:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. no evidence that it has begun principal prhotogaphy. DGG ( talk ) 02:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Has not began principal photography, per WP:NFF. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 18:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Anarkali of Arrah
- Anarkali of Arrah ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails to meet either the general notability guidelines or the specifc guidelines, appears to be too early for there to be notability regarding this Amortias ( T)( C) 19:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - I found a number of sources that discuss the movie, or at least casting for the movie. It's not a whole lot, but there does appear to be enough coverage to establish notability for the film. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 05:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 05:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 05:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Too Soon. ChunnuBhai ( talk) 03:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 00:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 00:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. no evidence that it has begun principal prhotogaphy. DGG ( talk ) 02:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Has not began principal photography, per WP:NFF. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 18:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.