The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Jenks24 (
talk) 04:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)reply
No evidence of any notability. Book claimed to be a best seller but no evidence that it is anything of the kind. This looks like a promo piece which fails
WP:GNGVelellaVelella Talk 08:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete for now as there's nothing to suggest much better at this time.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator's rationale. No reviews in non-RS. These two RS publishers in the article have not actually reviewed her books but only interviewed her.
[1] ,
[2]. §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 05:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Appears to get some publicity in Indian sources, but nothing that would reach notability as an author.
LaMona (
talk) 05:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom and above editors. Dharmadhyaksha's analysis is particularly spot on.
Onel5969TT me 02:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Jenks24 (
talk) 04:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)reply
No evidence of any notability. Book claimed to be a best seller but no evidence that it is anything of the kind. This looks like a promo piece which fails
WP:GNGVelellaVelella Talk 08:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete for now as there's nothing to suggest much better at this time.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator's rationale. No reviews in non-RS. These two RS publishers in the article have not actually reviewed her books but only interviewed her.
[1] ,
[2]. §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 05:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Appears to get some publicity in Indian sources, but nothing that would reach notability as an author.
LaMona (
talk) 05:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom and above editors. Dharmadhyaksha's analysis is particularly spot on.
Onel5969TT me 02:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.