The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The topic lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Current sources are either unreliable or merely passing mentions. I moved this page to draftspace in hopes of seeing improvements in the sources, but the author showed no interest in making changes and reverted it back.
GSS💬14:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete – Fails notability guidelines. Sources used in the article are simply ROUTINE and interviews/conversations (especially with titles starting with "Meet "subject name"). Elsewhere are unreliable content with no GNG sources found.
Toadette(
Let's discuss together!)16:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Per nom and
WP:GNG. In my own
WP:BEFORE, I find the same "passing mentions",
interviews and unreliable sources (IMDB bio) that we find in the article. Which, just about, support the text we have. But do not materially contribute to notability. There is nothing to indicate that
WP:CREATIVE is met (subject appears to be a filmmaker/producer - but not to the extent that is any more notable than anyone else in that job/role.) The apparent PROMO/COI/TONE/SPA issues do very little to help...
Guliolopez (
talk)
16:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. I would have suggested Draftifying the article due to the tone issues ("committed" and "passionate" - reads like a LinkedIn page!) and lack of reliable sources, but I see from the nominator that this has already been done and reverted. Current sources are mostly press releases and passing mentions, not meeting
WP:SIGCOV.
BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!17:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The topic lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Current sources are either unreliable or merely passing mentions. I moved this page to draftspace in hopes of seeing improvements in the sources, but the author showed no interest in making changes and reverted it back.
GSS💬14:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete – Fails notability guidelines. Sources used in the article are simply ROUTINE and interviews/conversations (especially with titles starting with "Meet "subject name"). Elsewhere are unreliable content with no GNG sources found.
Toadette(
Let's discuss together!)16:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Per nom and
WP:GNG. In my own
WP:BEFORE, I find the same "passing mentions",
interviews and unreliable sources (IMDB bio) that we find in the article. Which, just about, support the text we have. But do not materially contribute to notability. There is nothing to indicate that
WP:CREATIVE is met (subject appears to be a filmmaker/producer - but not to the extent that is any more notable than anyone else in that job/role.) The apparent PROMO/COI/TONE/SPA issues do very little to help...
Guliolopez (
talk)
16:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. I would have suggested Draftifying the article due to the tone issues ("committed" and "passionate" - reads like a LinkedIn page!) and lack of reliable sources, but I see from the nominator that this has already been done and reverted. Current sources are mostly press releases and passing mentions, not meeting
WP:SIGCOV.
BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!17:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.