- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 06:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Alsamarketing
- Alsamarketing ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a non-notable corporation. All sources are primary or simply on-line listings. Salimfadhley ( talk) 22:00, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:14, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - No references for it, no news notability; it simply doesn't meet basic WP:WEB. Just because it's a Salesforce member doesn't make it notable WP:INHERITORG -- CyberXRef talk 04:29, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: I am finding no substantial coverage of this firm. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD ( talk) 09:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I cannot find any sources that would help to support WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 15:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - company article lacking RS references to establish notability. A search turned up no significant RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 12:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 06:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Alsamarketing
- Alsamarketing ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a non-notable corporation. All sources are primary or simply on-line listings. Salimfadhley ( talk) 22:00, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:14, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - No references for it, no news notability; it simply doesn't meet basic WP:WEB. Just because it's a Salesforce member doesn't make it notable WP:INHERITORG -- CyberXRef talk 04:29, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: I am finding no substantial coverage of this firm. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD ( talk) 09:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I cannot find any sources that would help to support WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 15:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - company article lacking RS references to establish notability. A search turned up no significant RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 12:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.