The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. While it could be argued that this discussion should be closed as No consensus I find the new accounts who popped up to argue for Deletion more than a little suspicious. AFD is not a place that new editors find on their first few days editing. Plus those editors arguing to Keep this article are AFD regulars I trust. LizRead!Talk!06:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment Just noting that this account has only been registered for an hour and their only edits have been to start this AFD. No editing on any other Wikimedia projects either so I'm not sure how they know policy abbreviations. LizRead!Talk!01:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I guess it's not about her well known role, but the fact that all the cited sources in this page aren't considered reliable, as per the Wikipedia's reliable sources list:
If that is so, would you please recommend deletion for this article in this talk page. For some reason, this AFD hasn't produced much discussion as of yet and I'm not sure how Wikipedia will deal with such nomination whose discussion page doesn't even have one recommendation.
Raqib Sheikh (
talk)
11:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete I have also looked into the article and I frankly agree with the nomination. Couldn't find a single reference from a reliable source.
Ashik Rahik (
talk)
05:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: Most of the sources if not all were based on a notable film. I was also thinking of the nominations when
WP:ACTOR said, "multiple and lead roles". I became skeptic if her roles in the films other than Heartland (inclusively too). But the film.is notable and she was much credited for it. I have no other option that this meets notability guidelines.Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!02:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Theroadislong, appearing in multiple films without verifiability doesn't meet notability. Besides, almost all the sources were centralized to reviews or mention of her on the film, Heartland and remember, that isn't significant coverages. While Wikipedia is not perfect, redirect seems to work here per her acting non or less lead roles. Unless the article has been covered for playing a particular role in two or more films (considered notable per
WP:NFILM), it should be kept, if not —redirect per
WP:ATD. — Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!10:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Consensus currently seems split between redirect and delete. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk)
13:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep the sources here look good enough. And here's another one from a major newspaper in
2013. A decade of media coverage! And really, 10 seasons in a major national TV series - I'm not sure why we are here.
Nfitz (
talk)
16:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Are you sure the sources are reliable? Because they don't seem reliable to me, as per Wikipedia's reliable source list:
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia. None of the cited sources within the article are on the list. And as per my knowledge about Wikipedia, when an article does not have reliable sources as references, which is when some or at least one these sources is not cited, then there's a big reason to delete the article.
Raqib Sheikh (
talk)
05:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Are you really suggesting,
User:Raqib Sheikh that a 120-year old Postmedia broadsheet is not a reliable source? That list came about to document bad sources. The Toronto Star - the largest newspaper in the nation, and the paper of record in Toronto isn't there as well. Neither is The Gazette - the largest English-language paper in Quebec. Would you discount those? Their lack of presence on that list simply indicates no one has ever felt a need to question it!
Nfitz (
talk)
20:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. While it could be argued that this discussion should be closed as No consensus I find the new accounts who popped up to argue for Deletion more than a little suspicious. AFD is not a place that new editors find on their first few days editing. Plus those editors arguing to Keep this article are AFD regulars I trust. LizRead!Talk!06:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment Just noting that this account has only been registered for an hour and their only edits have been to start this AFD. No editing on any other Wikimedia projects either so I'm not sure how they know policy abbreviations. LizRead!Talk!01:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I guess it's not about her well known role, but the fact that all the cited sources in this page aren't considered reliable, as per the Wikipedia's reliable sources list:
If that is so, would you please recommend deletion for this article in this talk page. For some reason, this AFD hasn't produced much discussion as of yet and I'm not sure how Wikipedia will deal with such nomination whose discussion page doesn't even have one recommendation.
Raqib Sheikh (
talk)
11:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete I have also looked into the article and I frankly agree with the nomination. Couldn't find a single reference from a reliable source.
Ashik Rahik (
talk)
05:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: Most of the sources if not all were based on a notable film. I was also thinking of the nominations when
WP:ACTOR said, "multiple and lead roles". I became skeptic if her roles in the films other than Heartland (inclusively too). But the film.is notable and she was much credited for it. I have no other option that this meets notability guidelines.Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!02:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Theroadislong, appearing in multiple films without verifiability doesn't meet notability. Besides, almost all the sources were centralized to reviews or mention of her on the film, Heartland and remember, that isn't significant coverages. While Wikipedia is not perfect, redirect seems to work here per her acting non or less lead roles. Unless the article has been covered for playing a particular role in two or more films (considered notable per
WP:NFILM), it should be kept, if not —redirect per
WP:ATD. — Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!10:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Consensus currently seems split between redirect and delete. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk)
13:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep the sources here look good enough. And here's another one from a major newspaper in
2013. A decade of media coverage! And really, 10 seasons in a major national TV series - I'm not sure why we are here.
Nfitz (
talk)
16:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Are you sure the sources are reliable? Because they don't seem reliable to me, as per Wikipedia's reliable source list:
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia. None of the cited sources within the article are on the list. And as per my knowledge about Wikipedia, when an article does not have reliable sources as references, which is when some or at least one these sources is not cited, then there's a big reason to delete the article.
Raqib Sheikh (
talk)
05:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Are you really suggesting,
User:Raqib Sheikh that a 120-year old Postmedia broadsheet is not a reliable source? That list came about to document bad sources. The Toronto Star - the largest newspaper in the nation, and the paper of record in Toronto isn't there as well. Neither is The Gazette - the largest English-language paper in Quebec. Would you discount those? Their lack of presence on that list simply indicates no one has ever felt a need to question it!
Nfitz (
talk)
20:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.