- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete all. WP:SNOW applies here. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 00:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Ali Al-Ahsaei
- Ali Al-Ahsaei ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 21:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 21:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Abdulmajeed Al-Thunayan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Mohammed Awaji ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 21:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all - Fail NFOOTY as have not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subjects have garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down ( talk) 12:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
*Keep - The
Saudi Professional League is considered professional at
WP:FPL. If sources can be given showing that the subjects of the areticles played a game, than the articles should be kept.
Inter&anthro (
talk) 14:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - but that's the point of this AfD, although the players might be registered with an FPL club, there is no indication that they have actually played yet, thereby failing both GNG and the subject-specific guidelines. Fenix down ( talk) 14:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Never mind then, from the nominator's rational I misunderstood the reasoning. I have now changed my vote to Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Inter&anthro ( talk) 16:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all as mentioned, currently questionable for the applicable independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all - very clear GNG failure Spiderone 11:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all as failing the relevant guidelines for notability. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 00:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all as per nomination. No indication of notability. -- Hybris1984 ( talk) 22:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete all. WP:SNOW applies here. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 00:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Ali Al-Ahsaei
- Ali Al-Ahsaei ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 21:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 21:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Abdulmajeed Al-Thunayan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Mohammed Awaji ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 21:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all - Fail NFOOTY as have not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subjects have garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down ( talk) 12:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
*Keep - The
Saudi Professional League is considered professional at
WP:FPL. If sources can be given showing that the subjects of the areticles played a game, than the articles should be kept.
Inter&anthro (
talk) 14:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - but that's the point of this AfD, although the players might be registered with an FPL club, there is no indication that they have actually played yet, thereby failing both GNG and the subject-specific guidelines. Fenix down ( talk) 14:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Never mind then, from the nominator's rational I misunderstood the reasoning. I have now changed my vote to Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Inter&anthro ( talk) 16:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all as mentioned, currently questionable for the applicable independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all - very clear GNG failure Spiderone 11:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all as failing the relevant guidelines for notability. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 00:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all as per nomination. No indication of notability. -- Hybris1984 ( talk) 22:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.