- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Garuda3 ( talk) 10:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Alfred Delucchi
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Alfred Delucchi ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Longtime stub for a state trial court judge who presided over some notable trials, yes, but does not inherit notability from doing his job any more than does the bailiff for those cases. BD2412 T 01:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California. BD2412 T 01:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep after his death in 2008 several media outlets in the area published obituaries of him, including [1] [2] [3]. Passes the general notability guideline. Hut 8.5 17:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep
Wikipedia:JUDGE would seem he's eligible on that alone. However, presiding over the trials of Tyrone Robinson who murdered Black Panther Party co-founder Huey P. Newton, as well as presiding over the trial of Scott Peterson for the murder of Laci Peterson and her unborn child - these trials were big deals in coverage when they happened.
— Maile (
talk)
01:44, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- @
Maile66:
Wikipedia:JUDGE has two tests, one being for "judges who have held international, national, or state/province–wide office", which this judge by definition has not, and the other for having "received significant press coverage". What significant press coverage has this subject received that is not merely mentions of their functionary role with respect to their work?
BD2412
T
01:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not going to dig up the sourcing for you. But, believe me, there was much radio and TV coverage over both of these murders and subsequent trials. Huey P. Newton death and trial media coverage because of his cultural standing and significance at the time. Scott Peterson because killing his unborn son and wife was was a big media coverage situation. In trials like this, judges get more than a passing mention. You have the right to disagree with me, but I'm not changing my Keep above. — Maile ( talk) 02:04, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- @
Maile66:
Wikipedia:JUDGE has two tests, one being for "judges who have held international, national, or state/province–wide office", which this judge by definition has not, and the other for having "received significant press coverage". What significant press coverage has this subject received that is not merely mentions of their functionary role with respect to their work?
BD2412
T
01:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Combined with the obituaries (which on their own are insufficient), here are some others: [4], [5], [6]. With these we have enough for GNG and a short article. We also have some smaller mentions online (e.g., [7]) which help fill out the picture. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 08:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Garuda3 ( talk) 10:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Alfred Delucchi
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Alfred Delucchi ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Longtime stub for a state trial court judge who presided over some notable trials, yes, but does not inherit notability from doing his job any more than does the bailiff for those cases. BD2412 T 01:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California. BD2412 T 01:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep after his death in 2008 several media outlets in the area published obituaries of him, including [1] [2] [3]. Passes the general notability guideline. Hut 8.5 17:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep
Wikipedia:JUDGE would seem he's eligible on that alone. However, presiding over the trials of Tyrone Robinson who murdered Black Panther Party co-founder Huey P. Newton, as well as presiding over the trial of Scott Peterson for the murder of Laci Peterson and her unborn child - these trials were big deals in coverage when they happened.
— Maile (
talk)
01:44, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- @
Maile66:
Wikipedia:JUDGE has two tests, one being for "judges who have held international, national, or state/province–wide office", which this judge by definition has not, and the other for having "received significant press coverage". What significant press coverage has this subject received that is not merely mentions of their functionary role with respect to their work?
BD2412
T
01:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not going to dig up the sourcing for you. But, believe me, there was much radio and TV coverage over both of these murders and subsequent trials. Huey P. Newton death and trial media coverage because of his cultural standing and significance at the time. Scott Peterson because killing his unborn son and wife was was a big media coverage situation. In trials like this, judges get more than a passing mention. You have the right to disagree with me, but I'm not changing my Keep above. — Maile ( talk) 02:04, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- @
Maile66:
Wikipedia:JUDGE has two tests, one being for "judges who have held international, national, or state/province–wide office", which this judge by definition has not, and the other for having "received significant press coverage". What significant press coverage has this subject received that is not merely mentions of their functionary role with respect to their work?
BD2412
T
01:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Combined with the obituaries (which on their own are insufficient), here are some others: [4], [5], [6]. With these we have enough for GNG and a short article. We also have some smaller mentions online (e.g., [7]) which help fill out the picture. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 08:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.