The result was Delete consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 19:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Non notable, no sources and no google hits. Seems to fail WP:BAND. Harland1 ( t/ c) 18:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
listen wile i understand your justifiable cause to keep wiki free from self promotion it would have been easy for me to log on under an assumed name and post as a fan. i did not my e-mail address and name are open to see and would be happy to post them. we were an influential band at one point the biggest unsigned metal band touring and recording demos. i think our entry is fully justifiable. hopefullly it was correctly spelt and not one long advert. please advise how we could get a listing then, maybe if we cheat? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antony marshall ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
and i totaly understand this however in total we probably sold 4K+ and toured extensivly. by your standards radiohead would now be in danger because they are not signed to a major lable but there own! delete it if it makes you feel better but i thorgh the whole point of this was to have fun and enlighten people maybe its just so a select band of people can act as god? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Antony marshall (
talk •
contribs) 20:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
Delete Your method of arguing grows increasingly strange, especially when you begin comparing this band to Radiohead, which has sufficient documentation establishing their notability. As of yet this article has no sources whatsoever, and if you have any that support this bands claim to notability, then I might consider changing my vote. -- Nick Penguin( contribs) 20:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
i was not asking for radioheads entry to be deleted just said that if major label status was needed then theres a point in question right there. i understand the rules please feel free to deleate as it is the crime of the century to have someone most people have never heard of on wiki. by the way i run a pub probably one of the most sucsessful out there we have won or been runner up in 9 major awards in 2 years and shortlisted in 2 others next year (including the proud of pubs pub of the year award in the publican awards) could i enter this pub in wiki?? oh no because most people have not heard of it! please deleate this as it will make you all feel great and who am i to stop this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.79.196.51 ( talk) 10:37, 29 December 2007 (UTC) reply
jesus read the post i am NOT comparing us to radiohead jesus i hate there music anyway! we were far better! only joking! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.79.196.51 ( talk) 17:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC) reply
yep no prob. i know in the great scheem of things we were nothing but big up the little guy. oh and our guitar player has collated all our demos for our planned myspace page but if it does not fit then sorry im very new to wiki.
thanks we are not after a contract as we now are all married kids ect just recording our little band for postrerity. by the way we were in numours magazine in the late 80's early 90's still we tried ah haha —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.79.196.51 ( talk) 11:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 19:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Non notable, no sources and no google hits. Seems to fail WP:BAND. Harland1 ( t/ c) 18:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
listen wile i understand your justifiable cause to keep wiki free from self promotion it would have been easy for me to log on under an assumed name and post as a fan. i did not my e-mail address and name are open to see and would be happy to post them. we were an influential band at one point the biggest unsigned metal band touring and recording demos. i think our entry is fully justifiable. hopefullly it was correctly spelt and not one long advert. please advise how we could get a listing then, maybe if we cheat? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antony marshall ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
and i totaly understand this however in total we probably sold 4K+ and toured extensivly. by your standards radiohead would now be in danger because they are not signed to a major lable but there own! delete it if it makes you feel better but i thorgh the whole point of this was to have fun and enlighten people maybe its just so a select band of people can act as god? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Antony marshall (
talk •
contribs) 20:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
Delete Your method of arguing grows increasingly strange, especially when you begin comparing this band to Radiohead, which has sufficient documentation establishing their notability. As of yet this article has no sources whatsoever, and if you have any that support this bands claim to notability, then I might consider changing my vote. -- Nick Penguin( contribs) 20:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
i was not asking for radioheads entry to be deleted just said that if major label status was needed then theres a point in question right there. i understand the rules please feel free to deleate as it is the crime of the century to have someone most people have never heard of on wiki. by the way i run a pub probably one of the most sucsessful out there we have won or been runner up in 9 major awards in 2 years and shortlisted in 2 others next year (including the proud of pubs pub of the year award in the publican awards) could i enter this pub in wiki?? oh no because most people have not heard of it! please deleate this as it will make you all feel great and who am i to stop this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.79.196.51 ( talk) 10:37, 29 December 2007 (UTC) reply
jesus read the post i am NOT comparing us to radiohead jesus i hate there music anyway! we were far better! only joking! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.79.196.51 ( talk) 17:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC) reply
yep no prob. i know in the great scheem of things we were nothing but big up the little guy. oh and our guitar player has collated all our demos for our planned myspace page but if it does not fit then sorry im very new to wiki.
thanks we are not after a contract as we now are all married kids ect just recording our little band for postrerity. by the way we were in numours magazine in the late 80's early 90's still we tried ah haha —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.79.196.51 ( talk) 11:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC) reply