The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I'm not sure what "single event" is being referred to in the nomination. Pearce is an established journalist with a history of notability; the majority of sources are specifically about her (i.e. not
passing mentions) and cover several events in her career. It's not a particularly long article, but that doesn't mean it warrants deletion. –
Rhain☔12:04, 20 August 2021 (UTC)reply
comment A paid editing gang from India created this page for money. They get their money by going around nominating pages for deletion then contacting the subject of the page for a nominal fee. I have contacted the subject of this page and offered to help them in exchange for information on this Indian paid editing operation who use child labour and are financing the taliban.
Ferkingstad (
talk)
13:50, 20 August 2021 (UTC)reply
What? You nominated this article for deletion, not some Taliban-supporting cabal. Or are you explaining that this is why you nominated it? This is very strange.
Furius (
talk)
05:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)reply
That is a serious
personal attack on another editor, asserting that they are a member of " a paid editing gang from India". Unless you have any evidence, please retract it.
PamD11:36, 21 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep - there is clear
WP:GNG notability based on multiple independent and reliable sources in the article providing in-depth coverage focused on her and her career; and per the nominator's statement above,
WP:SKCRIT#2d appears to apply.
Beccaynr (
talk)
15:02, 20 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep: Not a close call in terms of notability. Clearly meets notability guidelines for the reasons that others have pointed out and the sources cited in the article.
DocFreeman24 (
talk)
22:47, 21 August 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I'm not sure what "single event" is being referred to in the nomination. Pearce is an established journalist with a history of notability; the majority of sources are specifically about her (i.e. not
passing mentions) and cover several events in her career. It's not a particularly long article, but that doesn't mean it warrants deletion. –
Rhain☔12:04, 20 August 2021 (UTC)reply
comment A paid editing gang from India created this page for money. They get their money by going around nominating pages for deletion then contacting the subject of the page for a nominal fee. I have contacted the subject of this page and offered to help them in exchange for information on this Indian paid editing operation who use child labour and are financing the taliban.
Ferkingstad (
talk)
13:50, 20 August 2021 (UTC)reply
What? You nominated this article for deletion, not some Taliban-supporting cabal. Or are you explaining that this is why you nominated it? This is very strange.
Furius (
talk)
05:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)reply
That is a serious
personal attack on another editor, asserting that they are a member of " a paid editing gang from India". Unless you have any evidence, please retract it.
PamD11:36, 21 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep - there is clear
WP:GNG notability based on multiple independent and reliable sources in the article providing in-depth coverage focused on her and her career; and per the nominator's statement above,
WP:SKCRIT#2d appears to apply.
Beccaynr (
talk)
15:02, 20 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep: Not a close call in terms of notability. Clearly meets notability guidelines for the reasons that others have pointed out and the sources cited in the article.
DocFreeman24 (
talk)
22:47, 21 August 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.