From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. No one came up with any indication of notability, by any criteria, although the delete arguments were disputed on technical grounds. So I guess this is, ahem, weak deleted. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 20:50, 19 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Akhada (TV series)

Akhada (TV series) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film by a non notable director. It fails WP:NFILM that requires a film to be "widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics." Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 08:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 10:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC) reply

its a tv series not a film Atlantic306 ( talk) 20:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. No one came up with any indication of notability, by any criteria, although the delete arguments were disputed on technical grounds. So I guess this is, ahem, weak deleted. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 20:50, 19 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Akhada (TV series)

Akhada (TV series) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film by a non notable director. It fails WP:NFILM that requires a film to be "widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics." Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 08:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 10:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC) reply

its a tv series not a film Atlantic306 ( talk) 20:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook