- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:35, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Ajit Nazre ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only thing this person seems potentially notable for is the Pao vs. Kleiner-Perkins lawsuit, but someone keeps deleting all reference to that and replacing it with a good score of personal weblinks - WP:NOTLINKEDIN. -- Seelefant ( talk) 01:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep They have significant independent coverage, have sat on the boards of numerous startups and was a partner in a well known firm. Mrfrobinson ( talk) 03:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete He is a run of the mill businessman. Generally we only have articles on heads of major firms or people who get significant independent coverage in business fields. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Minor, with insufficient substantial references. Being a partner in an investment firm is not automatic notability, though it can result on being on the board of the company one has financed; the involvement with Pao is incidental; and there is nothing else. FWIW, the subject originally started this himself. DGG ( talk ) 23:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Most of the media attention this guy got was because of the whole Ellen Pao incident which as described above is incidental at best. However, even if that makes him notable enough because of that whole fiasco, I find it suspicious that most of his involvement with Pao has been edited out by someone who most likely is a PR person for him/himself. This page either needs to be deleted, locked to outside editors, or the Pao information needs to be re-added since it is clearly of significance. GoldenSHK —Preceding undated comment added 02:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮ JAaron95 Talk 15:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮ JAaron95 Talk 15:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 14:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 14:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Vanity article about an average businessman, known only for a single event, having been named in the Ellen Pao case (see also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Analia Smith, where there's a sock farm doing nothing but spamming vanity links to Ajit Nazre's private web sites, adding promotional material about Nazre on various articles, and removing sourced material about people named in the Pao case, not only on this article but also on other articles...). Thomas.W talk 17:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: In case anyone doesn't know this article is just a recreation of Aniruddha (Ajit) Nazre, an article that was speedily deleted on 2 May 2015 per A7 ("No credible indication of importance"). Thomas.W talk 17:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Delete: This article is probably created by Ajit Nazre himself, at least creator should have used another username while creating article. But this article shows that he is little bit notable. I will suggest creator to try WP:AFC procedure if he wants this article in mainspace sometime in future. -- Human3015 Send WikiLove 10:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:35, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Ajit Nazre ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only thing this person seems potentially notable for is the Pao vs. Kleiner-Perkins lawsuit, but someone keeps deleting all reference to that and replacing it with a good score of personal weblinks - WP:NOTLINKEDIN. -- Seelefant ( talk) 01:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep They have significant independent coverage, have sat on the boards of numerous startups and was a partner in a well known firm. Mrfrobinson ( talk) 03:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete He is a run of the mill businessman. Generally we only have articles on heads of major firms or people who get significant independent coverage in business fields. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Minor, with insufficient substantial references. Being a partner in an investment firm is not automatic notability, though it can result on being on the board of the company one has financed; the involvement with Pao is incidental; and there is nothing else. FWIW, the subject originally started this himself. DGG ( talk ) 23:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Most of the media attention this guy got was because of the whole Ellen Pao incident which as described above is incidental at best. However, even if that makes him notable enough because of that whole fiasco, I find it suspicious that most of his involvement with Pao has been edited out by someone who most likely is a PR person for him/himself. This page either needs to be deleted, locked to outside editors, or the Pao information needs to be re-added since it is clearly of significance. GoldenSHK —Preceding undated comment added 02:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮ JAaron95 Talk 15:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮ JAaron95 Talk 15:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 14:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 14:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Vanity article about an average businessman, known only for a single event, having been named in the Ellen Pao case (see also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Analia Smith, where there's a sock farm doing nothing but spamming vanity links to Ajit Nazre's private web sites, adding promotional material about Nazre on various articles, and removing sourced material about people named in the Pao case, not only on this article but also on other articles...). Thomas.W talk 17:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: In case anyone doesn't know this article is just a recreation of Aniruddha (Ajit) Nazre, an article that was speedily deleted on 2 May 2015 per A7 ("No credible indication of importance"). Thomas.W talk 17:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Delete: This article is probably created by Ajit Nazre himself, at least creator should have used another username while creating article. But this article shows that he is little bit notable. I will suggest creator to try WP:AFC procedure if he wants this article in mainspace sometime in future. -- Human3015 Send WikiLove 10:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.