- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Wifione Message 17:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Aeryon Scout ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No assertion of notability, and no independent nor reliable sources. Article is basically an ad, and more seem to be on its way at Articles for Creation. FoCuSandLeArN ( talk) 11:22, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - While the article is very spammy and reads like it was written by the manufacturer's PR department, the cited refs do establish notability. The one cited Wall Street Journal ref does not mention the Scout and the Globe and Mail ref is no longer available, but the CNet and CBC articles cited discuss the Scout and do establish notability. There are probably paper refs available on the subject too, such as Janes All The World's Aircraft. It does need a complete re-write however.- Ahunt ( talk) 11:47, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. The article seems to feature a bunch of dead links, but there does seem to be coverage of the thing on the web, including coverage of its use by various governmental agencies. As per Ahunt, this should be a candidate for major rewrite, rather than deletion. — daranz [ t ] 23:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 02:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep For some reason this thing looks awfully familiar, but as noted the concern is promotion; this calls for cleanup, not deletion, and AfD is not for cleanup. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Wifione Message 17:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Aeryon Scout ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No assertion of notability, and no independent nor reliable sources. Article is basically an ad, and more seem to be on its way at Articles for Creation. FoCuSandLeArN ( talk) 11:22, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - While the article is very spammy and reads like it was written by the manufacturer's PR department, the cited refs do establish notability. The one cited Wall Street Journal ref does not mention the Scout and the Globe and Mail ref is no longer available, but the CNet and CBC articles cited discuss the Scout and do establish notability. There are probably paper refs available on the subject too, such as Janes All The World's Aircraft. It does need a complete re-write however.- Ahunt ( talk) 11:47, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. The article seems to feature a bunch of dead links, but there does seem to be coverage of the thing on the web, including coverage of its use by various governmental agencies. As per Ahunt, this should be a candidate for major rewrite, rather than deletion. — daranz [ t ] 23:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 02:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep For some reason this thing looks awfully familiar, but as noted the concern is promotion; this calls for cleanup, not deletion, and AfD is not for cleanup. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.