The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Rely only on non-credible media sources. Article is written only for company promotional and advertising purposes. No significant coverage by independent media. Nothing significant or notable about the company to be here. does not meet notability criteria. Light21 15:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Light2021 (
talk) 14:53, 19 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - it looks at first glance like a promotional article but for a potentially-notable company ... but then you get to the sources, and they are literally all bad -
David Gerard (
talk) 16:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Question Who is the nominator here?
Ottawahitech (
talk) 12:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)please
ping mereply
Light2021, who only just got their signature working properly -
David Gerard (
talk) 13:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete: The only RS I can find is
this, which isn't enough.
Safehaven86 (
talk) 18:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Rely only on non-credible media sources. Article is written only for company promotional and advertising purposes. No significant coverage by independent media. Nothing significant or notable about the company to be here. does not meet notability criteria. Light21 15:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Light2021 (
talk) 14:53, 19 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - it looks at first glance like a promotional article but for a potentially-notable company ... but then you get to the sources, and they are literally all bad -
David Gerard (
talk) 16:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Question Who is the nominator here?
Ottawahitech (
talk) 12:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)please
ping mereply
Light2021, who only just got their signature working properly -
David Gerard (
talk) 13:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete: The only RS I can find is
this, which isn't enough.
Safehaven86 (
talk) 18:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.