- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge)
- Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unreferenced. not notable Rathfelder ( talk) 23:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 06:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: the article for the second (still unreleased) album by this artist, Act II: Patents of Nobility (The Turn), is also up for deletion, and I noted in that discussion that it had been redirected four times to Jay Electronica and reverted each time – this article has also been redirected and restored twice in its history, so someone is watching these articles and restoring them without providing a reason. Jay Electronica himself is notable with plenty of articles out there (the July 2010 issue of Spin, for example). But this is a 15-minute mixtape originally distributed via his MySpace website (and now available on Tidal) – the very fact that its release was so underground and low-key makes it hard to find reliable sources about the album itself. I'd suggest another redirect to Jay Electronica's article, but we'd have to watch out for it being reverted once again. Richard3120 ( talk) 16:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and salt - I found a source for one claim, but there are no reviews, and most people writing about the artist don't even realize he has any stuff. Source aside, this doesn't meet WP:NALBUM. As for other issues, the redirect reversion is a problem, and barring locking the redirect page (which I'm trying to ascertain the feasability of), I don't know how else to avoid the problem besides the one I'm offering. MSJapan ( talk) 22:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 15:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 15:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and salt I seriously do not see how this album is even remotely notable per WP:NALBUM. I personally would have considered a redirect here, but seeing how the redirect has been constantly reverted, I am going with a delete and salt. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 10:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per the above. Lacks significant coverage to satisfy WP:NALBUM/ WP:GNG. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 15:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge)
- Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unreferenced. not notable Rathfelder ( talk) 23:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 06:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: the article for the second (still unreleased) album by this artist, Act II: Patents of Nobility (The Turn), is also up for deletion, and I noted in that discussion that it had been redirected four times to Jay Electronica and reverted each time – this article has also been redirected and restored twice in its history, so someone is watching these articles and restoring them without providing a reason. Jay Electronica himself is notable with plenty of articles out there (the July 2010 issue of Spin, for example). But this is a 15-minute mixtape originally distributed via his MySpace website (and now available on Tidal) – the very fact that its release was so underground and low-key makes it hard to find reliable sources about the album itself. I'd suggest another redirect to Jay Electronica's article, but we'd have to watch out for it being reverted once again. Richard3120 ( talk) 16:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and salt - I found a source for one claim, but there are no reviews, and most people writing about the artist don't even realize he has any stuff. Source aside, this doesn't meet WP:NALBUM. As for other issues, the redirect reversion is a problem, and barring locking the redirect page (which I'm trying to ascertain the feasability of), I don't know how else to avoid the problem besides the one I'm offering. MSJapan ( talk) 22:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 15:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 15:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and salt I seriously do not see how this album is even remotely notable per WP:NALBUM. I personally would have considered a redirect here, but seeing how the redirect has been constantly reverted, I am going with a delete and salt. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 10:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per the above. Lacks significant coverage to satisfy WP:NALBUM/ WP:GNG. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 15:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.