From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 17:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Abyssinia-class ocean liner

Abyssinia-class ocean liner (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a class of ships but rather three ships which were ordered at about the same time. Abyssinia and Algeria were similar but Parthia was very different. No source provided to state that either the owners or any RS considers them a class. Duncan Haws a RS authority in his book listing all Cunard vessels makes no such statement. Only source provided does not support the idea they were a class and indeed does not support the descriptive claims in the article Lyndaship ( talk) 07:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Delete no justification for the claim they formed a class. It is an anachronism projecting late 20th century ideas on the 19th century. Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 20:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 01:23, 9 October 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 17:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Abyssinia-class ocean liner

Abyssinia-class ocean liner (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a class of ships but rather three ships which were ordered at about the same time. Abyssinia and Algeria were similar but Parthia was very different. No source provided to state that either the owners or any RS considers them a class. Duncan Haws a RS authority in his book listing all Cunard vessels makes no such statement. Only source provided does not support the idea they were a class and indeed does not support the descriptive claims in the article Lyndaship ( talk) 07:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Delete no justification for the claim they formed a class. It is an anachronism projecting late 20th century ideas on the 19th century. Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 20:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 01:23, 9 October 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook