The result was no consensus. The deletes say this is WP:ONEEVENT, the keeps say he is sufficiently important to that event that he meets the ONEEVENT criteria for an individual's standalone article. However, no clear consensus was reached, so I am closing as No consensus, without prejudice against a re-nomination. I would suggest that if this is renominated, interested WikiProjects be notified, and relevant DelSort categories be added to the new AfD, to enable a fuller discussion to be possible. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 23:08, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
per WP:ONEEVENT. Subject hasn't actually done anything notable (the article itself makes a barely-credible claim of importance as "one of the first organisers", and so I don't think a speedy is appropriate). Basalisk inspect damage⁄ berate 12:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Let's be frank here -- your presumably genuinely held position and the tongue-in-cheek mocking argument of that wise guy are not that dissimilar. No offense, but it seems to me your conflation of these three events into one event reflects a POV judgment on your part that the efforts of those working for political reform in Arab countries lack importance.
You haven't explained WHY' you do not recognize five months of torture as a separate event from his death in the indiscriminate bombardment of civilians. One interpretation of your position is that you think the Syrian government is entitled to employ torture and the indiscriminate bombardment of civilians -- civilians who were not entitled to seek political change in the first place -- so everything that happened to them was their fault. Is this why you characterize his torture and his death through the indiscriminate bombardment of civilians as the same event as his leadership role in the original demonstrations? Geo Swan ( talk) 14:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. The deletes say this is WP:ONEEVENT, the keeps say he is sufficiently important to that event that he meets the ONEEVENT criteria for an individual's standalone article. However, no clear consensus was reached, so I am closing as No consensus, without prejudice against a re-nomination. I would suggest that if this is renominated, interested WikiProjects be notified, and relevant DelSort categories be added to the new AfD, to enable a fuller discussion to be possible. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 23:08, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
per WP:ONEEVENT. Subject hasn't actually done anything notable (the article itself makes a barely-credible claim of importance as "one of the first organisers", and so I don't think a speedy is appropriate). Basalisk inspect damage⁄ berate 12:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Let's be frank here -- your presumably genuinely held position and the tongue-in-cheek mocking argument of that wise guy are not that dissimilar. No offense, but it seems to me your conflation of these three events into one event reflects a POV judgment on your part that the efforts of those working for political reform in Arab countries lack importance.
You haven't explained WHY' you do not recognize five months of torture as a separate event from his death in the indiscriminate bombardment of civilians. One interpretation of your position is that you think the Syrian government is entitled to employ torture and the indiscriminate bombardment of civilians -- civilians who were not entitled to seek political change in the first place -- so everything that happened to them was their fault. Is this why you characterize his torture and his death through the indiscriminate bombardment of civilians as the same event as his leadership role in the original demonstrations? Geo Swan ( talk) 14:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply