The result was keep. No arguments for deletion, nominator has withdrawn. Davewild ( talk) 10:05, 8 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This article relies on a single "source". Most of the text cannot be derived from the "source" Even if it could be, this has none of the indicia of a reliable source, as that term is defined on en.wikipedia. So what we're left with is entirely based on prohibited original research David in DC ( talk) 20:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion, nominator has withdrawn. Davewild ( talk) 10:05, 8 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This article relies on a single "source". Most of the text cannot be derived from the "source" Even if it could be, this has none of the indicia of a reliable source, as that term is defined on en.wikipedia. So what we're left with is entirely based on prohibited original research David in DC ( talk) 20:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC) reply