The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable Donald Duck short from the 1940s. I couldn't find anything sourcing wise that would help it pass
GNG. There is a trivial, passing mention of it in a book, but that's not enough IMO. Maybe the content could be merged somewhere, but I'm not sure where.
Adamant1 (
talk) 07:05, 13 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep thanks to good ref finds from
Toughpigs. Nothing wrong with having a stub article. -
2pou (
talk) 15:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as the article has been significantly improved with the addition of content from multiple reliable sources as per
WP:GNG, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk) 23:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as sufficiently notable. --
Lockley (
talk) 18:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep All Donald Duck cartoons have been covered by dozens of books. A great number of sources can be added to this or any other Donald Duck/Walt Disney short if given the time.
Donaldd23 (
talk) 15:40, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable Donald Duck short from the 1940s. I couldn't find anything sourcing wise that would help it pass
GNG. There is a trivial, passing mention of it in a book, but that's not enough IMO. Maybe the content could be merged somewhere, but I'm not sure where.
Adamant1 (
talk) 07:05, 13 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep thanks to good ref finds from
Toughpigs. Nothing wrong with having a stub article. -
2pou (
talk) 15:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as the article has been significantly improved with the addition of content from multiple reliable sources as per
WP:GNG, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk) 23:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as sufficiently notable. --
Lockley (
talk) 18:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep All Donald Duck cartoons have been covered by dozens of books. A great number of sources can be added to this or any other Donald Duck/Walt Disney short if given the time.
Donaldd23 (
talk) 15:40, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.