- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Will userfy on request. Deor ( talk) 22:01, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
A Dangerous Cure
- A Dangerous Cure ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Laun chba ller 14:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable movie being promoted by its creator. (I am glad that their effects budget was large enough to allow the inside of a disk drive to stand for technology that spawns an epidemic.) — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 17:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Userfy a new article on a newer indie film that is only now beginning to get independent coverage. Let its author have it back for continued work as it approaches the requirements set by WP:NF. Schmidt, Michael Q. 17:10, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey2010 • (talk) 03:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (warn) @ 12:55, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NFF. CesareAngelotti ( talk) 22:37, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, but as the film is completed and has screened, WP:NFF does not apply. Schmidt, Michael Q. 03:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete insufficient significant coverage for a new film, maybe it is WP:TOOSOON, or maybe it is not worth the candle. Either way, delete for now. Come back if it garners significant coverage or notable awards. -- Bejnar ( talk) 13:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Will userfy on request. Deor ( talk) 22:01, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
A Dangerous Cure
- A Dangerous Cure ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Laun chba ller 14:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable movie being promoted by its creator. (I am glad that their effects budget was large enough to allow the inside of a disk drive to stand for technology that spawns an epidemic.) — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 17:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Userfy a new article on a newer indie film that is only now beginning to get independent coverage. Let its author have it back for continued work as it approaches the requirements set by WP:NF. Schmidt, Michael Q. 17:10, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey2010 • (talk) 03:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (warn) @ 12:55, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NFF. CesareAngelotti ( talk) 22:37, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, but as the film is completed and has screened, WP:NFF does not apply. Schmidt, Michael Q. 03:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete insufficient significant coverage for a new film, maybe it is WP:TOOSOON, or maybe it is not worth the candle. Either way, delete for now. Come back if it garners significant coverage or notable awards. -- Bejnar ( talk) 13:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.