- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 23:04, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
APTelecom
- APTelecom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is very promotional in nature, and no secondary sources are cited. Research does not turn up anything that suggests WP:CORPDEPTH. Agtx ( talk) 06:26, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:24, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete with preferrably no draft/userfy unless needed considering there's not much significantly good to the article - In addition to the mostly press releases as sources, my searches found more and no actual good coverage here, here and here. There isn't even anything to clean it to a locally notable company. SwisterTwister talk 17:51, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The fact that the current article is cited exclusively to primary sources and press releases is sufficient, such that even if they are notable, WP:TNT would apply. Once the press releases and primary sources were removed, there would be no article left. CorporateM ( Talk) 07:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 23:04, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
APTelecom
- APTelecom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is very promotional in nature, and no secondary sources are cited. Research does not turn up anything that suggests WP:CORPDEPTH. Agtx ( talk) 06:26, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:24, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete with preferrably no draft/userfy unless needed considering there's not much significantly good to the article - In addition to the mostly press releases as sources, my searches found more and no actual good coverage here, here and here. There isn't even anything to clean it to a locally notable company. SwisterTwister talk 17:51, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The fact that the current article is cited exclusively to primary sources and press releases is sufficient, such that even if they are notable, WP:TNT would apply. Once the press releases and primary sources were removed, there would be no article left. CorporateM ( Talk) 07:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.