The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable club. Gsearch's first hit is this article, then their own website, then various blogs and such. Nothing in Gnews. This is likely PROMO for some sort of MMA club.
Oaktree b (
talk)
03:09, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete I see interviews with the club's owner, passing mentions ("fighter x trained at AMA"), and some blog mentions. None of these is sufficient to show that
WP:GNG or any SNG is met. There's a definite lack of significant independent coverage in reliable sources about this gym.
Papaursa (
talk)
03:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete The references that do mention the gym appear to mostly be blogs of dubious reliability. Others have no mention of the gym and a few are deadlinks. Best,
GPL93 (
talk)
13:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per WP:FIGHTCLUB: Welcome to AMA Fight Club. The first rule of AMA Fight Club is: you do not talk about AMA Fight Club. The second rule of AMA Fight Club is: you DO NOT talk about AMA Fight Club! Third rule of AMA Fight Club: if someone yells "Delete!", fails to provide in-depth reliable and verifiable sources establishing notability, or taps out, the article is over. The first two rules are violated in that AMA Fight Club is being discussed here. Rule three is not met as there are no such sources here. As the WP:FIGHTCLUB standard is not met, the article should be deleted.
Alansohn (
talk)
18:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable club. Gsearch's first hit is this article, then their own website, then various blogs and such. Nothing in Gnews. This is likely PROMO for some sort of MMA club.
Oaktree b (
talk)
03:09, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete I see interviews with the club's owner, passing mentions ("fighter x trained at AMA"), and some blog mentions. None of these is sufficient to show that
WP:GNG or any SNG is met. There's a definite lack of significant independent coverage in reliable sources about this gym.
Papaursa (
talk)
03:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete The references that do mention the gym appear to mostly be blogs of dubious reliability. Others have no mention of the gym and a few are deadlinks. Best,
GPL93 (
talk)
13:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per WP:FIGHTCLUB: Welcome to AMA Fight Club. The first rule of AMA Fight Club is: you do not talk about AMA Fight Club. The second rule of AMA Fight Club is: you DO NOT talk about AMA Fight Club! Third rule of AMA Fight Club: if someone yells "Delete!", fails to provide in-depth reliable and verifiable sources establishing notability, or taps out, the article is over. The first two rules are violated in that AMA Fight Club is being discussed here. Rule three is not met as there are no such sources here. As the WP:FIGHTCLUB standard is not met, the article should be deleted.
Alansohn (
talk)
18:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.